Well then I guess I need a new vehicle because I’m a handyman and I use a truck.
Yes, yes you do.
Well then I guess I need a new vehicle because I’m a handyman and I use a truck.
Yes, yes you do.
Yeah, Trump has already been president once. There is no escaping being a laughing stock country after that one.
Cool. Then you get what you want, because this is exactly what tiktok is.
It has nothing to do with “opposing ideologies”, it is how you are behaving like toxic assholes 100% of the time.
Nah, it is just a lot of hexbear alt accounts like yourself on your disingenously labeled “reasonable” side.
What a disingenous comment. Having two accounts of two defederated instances makes even more sense than having them on two federated instances.
Still doesn’t make any sense at all. Is she suffering from some sort of eating disorder?
deleted by creator
How about adressing the issue instead of just cresting strawmen about the messengers?
This feature is an actual fundamrntal privacy issue.
A lot of US defaultism going on in this thread. Americans (and perhaps British) talking about the North American grey squirrel as the incarnation of all squirrels, when people elsewhere in the world would have very different experiences with their local native squirrels, who act quite differently to those.
Depends on where you live. I only have the Eurasian red squirrel in my country, and they are definitely not a nuisance to any vegetable planting plans.
A particular species of squirrels. I think people in this thread fail to make clear that this is exclusively about the North American grey squirrel. The Eurasian red squirrel is not invasive anywhere, And I strongly doubt anyone have any problem with having them in their bird feeder, since they are solitary and relatively shy creatures.
The Putin bots are really out in force in this thread.
It seems to me that the major issue people were complaining about was the thing even existing in the first place (and rightly so). So by them still wanting to implement it, they have fixed absolutely nothing.
*Mikkelsen. Mikkelson is Swedish, so kinda an insult to Danes.
This argument keeps missing that it is not only the quality but mainly the quantity of fakes which is going to be the problem. The complete undermining of trust in photographic evidence is seen as a good thing for so many nefarious vested interests, that this is an aim they will actively strive for.
It is the quantity of fakes because of the easy process which is going to be the problem. Fake pictures will very soon outnumber real, and the amount of them will still kerp grjwing exponentially even after that.
The thing is that in the future the mere quantity of fakes will make the careful vetting process you describe physically impossible. You will be bombarded with high quality fakes to such an extent that you will simply have to give up trying to keep up, so it will be a choice of either dropping the vetting process or dropping bringing any pictures altogether. For profit driven corporate jwbed media outlets, the choice unfortunately will be obvious.
Yeah, it is going to be mainly a quantity issue rather than a quality one. The quality of faked photos has already been high since photoshop. Now a constant growing avalanche of high quality fakes (produced by all sorts of different vested interests with their own particular purposes) is going to barrage us on a daily basis, simply because it is cheap and easy
It seems to me that drunk driving is much more accepted in the US than in Europe.