I’m all for it.

  • spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Typically, imo, most people who aren’t ready to jump to Linux are there because their top couple of games are ruled by arrogant devs/publishers who balk at the idea of ticking an “enable proton compatibility” checkbox with their anticheat.

    From what I’ve seen Proton has hit a quality of compatibility that the games will just run, and typically better than Windows. If it doesn’t run it’s usually because it’s too new and proton needs a patch, or the devs/publishers did the aforementioned “no, i won’t tick the checkbox, it’s too hard.” bullshit.

    Basically, if your waiting on a game to be supported for proton, it may need to wait until Linux adoption hits around 20 percent before the devs/publishers get that bullshit idea out of their head.

    • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me it’s that a lot of the open source options to replace the Adobe and MS Office suites just always fall short. Trouble shooting Linux issues feels like hell after a lifetime of learning how to troubleshoot Windows issues.

      Adobe is the bane of my existence for many reasons, and I jump ship wherever I can. But GIMP doesn’t really compare to Photoshop. Inkscape doesn’t work well against illustrator - the only open source artistic creation software I swear by is blender. Davinci resolve isnt bad compared to premier pro though - but not After Effects.

      MS office isn’t great either (why does Ms word operate like it exists in a separate instance of reality that’s forever stuck in the 90s?!)

      Microsoft captured the corporate world and compatibility with the off brand stuff is a huge issue

      • Leshoyadut@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The one that got me recently when I tried Linux was mouse software. I couldn’t configure my mouse buttons even close to what I have on Windows (couldn’t use modifiers like shift or control on one mouse, to start), and it just felt bad.

        • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What mouse? Logitech and Razer have alternative control panels for Linux that should allow this.

      • spudwart@spudwart.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Try Krita. It’s pretty similar to photoshop. A few creature comforts will be lost, but not too many substantial things.

        However, if you really use the curved text feature of photoshop a lot, you may miss that.

        • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh nice, thanks for the suggestion I’ll try it out. I don’t use the curved text in photoshop, that’s usually done in illustrator in my workflow

        • nutsack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          gimp is like Photoshop 3.0 or something it’s a piece of shit it’s super old and it sucks

          • Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I feel like GIMP was a depraved person’s creative exercise in designing a UI and workflow as fucking shit as humanly possible and then leaving it like that for a couple of decades while continuing to develop the program.

            But in reality I know it’s probably due to the complexities of maintaining such an old project with limited resources and volunteers and I’m grateful something like it even exists.

        • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Masking is not nearly as easy to apply. It’s very quick to get smooth edges in your mask in Photoshop.

          Photoshop now has a built in AI (Beta Version) to generate backgrounds or add things to your image.

          In GIMP, you can only use one artboard (canvas) at a time. Photoshop can have multiple within one file

          Photoshop can link directly to illustrator and can handle vectors, not just rasterized images.

          Most of the scaling and filtering tools just tend to work better in Photoshop. Also The “Object Selection” tool in Photoshop is amazing. This doesn’t exist in GIMP.

          Smart objects are nice too (Photoshop only) - makes it so you can edit one object and change it across multiple artboards + other functionality.

          And one of my biggest issues, GIMP can’t edit pictures in CMYK - it’s a big work around just to try and export your sRGB image to CMYK in GIMP, but your colors will change.

          Literally the only thing I like GIMP over Photoshop for is that it’s easier to add gradients with a transparency

          Edit:

          Oh and gimp is good at changing specific color hues quickly. But that’s all I’ve found

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “enable proton compatibility” checkbox with their anticheat.

      Isn’t proton mainly a steam thing?

      Because honestly, the reason I’m not jumping to linux, is all the heavily modded GOG stuff and nexus mod manager.

      That and bad experiences in the past.

      • serpineslair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you get the heroic launcher, you can install proton or proton GE and use them on Epic Games or GOG games. I’m pretty sure there is a way of doing it without a launcher but it is less user friendly. I also prefer Heroic to Lutris.

    • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      if your waiting on a game to be supported for proton, it may need to wait until Linux adoption hits around 20 percent before the devs/publishers get that bullshit idea out of their head.

      So never.

    • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have no allegiance to either, the second Linux is consistently beating Windows and compatible with 95%ish of new releases I’m in. Steam Deck proved that it is a matter of time I think, thank you Valve 🙏

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I literally game on nothing else right now.

        Sure, in an ideal world I’d be rocking 4k and max settings, but I just want to play the games. I’ve been so tied up for the last 8 years that I have a wonderful back catalog of games to play. I’m currently playing RDR2 and holy shit it might be the greatest game ever made.

        I dock it for older games that I need keyboard and mouse to play.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      nobody is jumping to Linux except developers and Linux users. ive used it every day for 20 years. it departments aren’t putting it on employee machines. your mom isn’t going to install it on her laptop that she uses to do her taxes and play the sims 3. it’s not ever going to happen because Linux isn’t software that’s meant to do that.

      you’re not only naive if you think “the year of the linux desktop” is a real thing, you’re illogical and you’re probably an idiot. it doesn’t even make sense. reddit is so full of toilet optimism that it has no idea what’s going on.

      • spudwart@spudwart.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You haven’t been paying attention. Literally the best selling item on Steam for nearly a year and a half was a Linux Gaming PC.

        Linux is far more flexible than Windows. The nature of open source is what enables such flexibility. The only reason Linux hasn’t been adopted by many is simply because of the chicken and egg issue.

        Microsoft and Apple had made a monopoly on the market for desktop computers, And since the desktop market share was so low for linux, few devs developed desktop software for Linux. Which then in turn kept Linux from gaining marketshare.

        But the times are changing. Wine, Proton, Lutris and Multi-Platform web app tools have lead to a world where devs can simply just mindlessly go “oh yeah I guess we can enable linux builds/proton supported builds.” and just forget about it.

        For example, lets say it was 2006 and Discord was just released in that time period. Instead of being a web app, they built a client that communicated using an API for Discord. Well, more than likely that official client was Windows and maybe MacOS exclusive. They built it from the ground up, and sure it has an API and sure a linux client may exist. But it would never be 1:1 with the official client.

        This was the most likely thing to happen, and theres no way you can convince grandma to try Linux when all of her basic apps don’t work anymore.

        Fast forward to 2023. Unless Grandma is using Adobe software, Linux will work fine. Chromebooks sold well for basic users afterall.