• Drew@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The android dream is over. It was fun while it lasted. My next phone will be linux

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    So Android is pointless now?
    No, really. If I’m gonna be dragged kicking and screaming into the walled garden, why would I go with Google’s joke of an ecosystem instead of much nicer and better integrated Apple garden?

    I might as well start carrying one of those weird branded ultra-tiny laptops from AliExpress and some used, older iPhone for the 2 apps I need.
    Fuck it. Throw out the baby, the bathwater, the bathtub, the whole damn thing. Fuuuuck it.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      i have a feeling that google largely gave up on making a decent phone for a while, all they want is your data, plus to put thier AI into everything to offset the cost of using AI.

      • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        To be fair, they never cared about making a decent phone. They have always just wanted your data. They are a marketing company and you are the product up for sale.

  • mub@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I thought the EU said that Google and apple have to permit other app stores? If that is the case they’d have to allow side loading in effect.

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    20 hours ago

    For your security we’re going to block your access to FOSS and apps that let you avoid our ads. This is totally not a business decision. Pinky swear.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      and avoid our datamining capabilities, and the intrusive AI we keep pushing on unwanted customers. we knew thier android core app(spyware) was the first step. they probably want that to permanantly installed into everyones phone.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I heard that they’re probably going to be using the Google Play store and probably similar modules to play protect to enforce this. So the question becomes will disabling the Google Play store bypass this? It outright kills play protect dialogue as well as its app disabling capability as a whole since play protect is part of Google Play store.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, need them hardware manufacturers too.
      We would have plenty of Linux phones if drivers were open sauce or even just available closed sauce.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Google says it’s no different than checking IDs at the airport.

    You’re not a fucking airport, Google!

  • Coopr8@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    No one talking about how this could completely annihilate open source .apk development? First off the lead dev has to get identity verified to get a key, which will reduce the number of devs willing to push through friction to start a project. Then when the key is issued and it is posted to the repository, what keeps anyone from grabbing it and using it for another repo? We’ll they have an official app registration of some kind, ok, what about version control? Does every new version have to be registered before it can be loaded and tested? Same for forks?

    This is about to be a terrible mess, Google is assassinating FOSS with this.

    • Awkwardparticle@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      It will kill everyone that is playing around with the phones. I have done a couple mobile projects where I just sideloaded the package I created to quickly test it and to demo it to people. Now that I can’t do that why would I develop for your platform by choice.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You distribute the code without your key and a built package that is signed. This isn’t exactly rocket science.

      Anyone who forks the code will have to use their own key to install a package they built.

      It’s just unnecessary red tape.

      • kureta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s just unnecessary red tape.

        Which will reduce the number of people using foss apks, which will in turn, reduce the motivation, and then the number, of foss apk developers.

    • Drew@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Graphene and PostmarketOS. Biggest issue is banks and other organisations that only want to make apps that run in locked down environments. There needs to be a real push to bring in legislation to make this stuff work.

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Google has been been cracking down on installing .apk’s on your phone for years and they’re getting more and more aggressive about it. It’s not a question of if they’ll disallow it completely, but when.

    It’s already extremely tedious. Back in the Android 2.3 days (oh, good old Gingerbread) you could just get an APK and install it, but those times are long gone.

    Years ago they threatened the developer of Total Commander to remove his app from the PlayStore unless he patched out an APK install feature, so he was forced to do that.

    Now another example: Try to install eBay on a phone that is not passing device integrity. It is not listed on the PlayStore because your device doesn’t pass safety checks. You can grab an APK and install it, but the OS will check if the app has been installed through the PlayStore and if it hasn’t, it will complain and close itself.

    GrapheneOS has patched that bullshit out, btw.

    And this behaviour happens with all apps where the developer has enabled the “App Integrity” option, which is heavily pushed as a super-great security feature. So developers might just enable that feature, not being fully aware of the implications.

    As you can see, it’s one method at a time, slowly but surely, until Google fully controls the ecosystem. The intention behind that is pretty clear: They don’t want people to have AdAway and Revanced, they want money and user data. And they also want you to login to the PlayStore, get hooked on their stupid daily points challenges and spend your hard-earned money on virtual crap.

    This is textbook enshittification, it will only get worse from here on.

          • NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            To be fair, unless you’re using a private, controllable DNS with a frontend interface (like NextDNS, Pihole, etc) – DNS ad blocking is “all or nothing”. Those apps let you control which apps and services and domains come through.

            • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I’m aware, I choose to use the adguard one but I’ve used the on-device ones in the past