• Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s pretty disingenuous - it’s one of the many reasons that comprise a pattern of behavior whereby Microsoft makes Windows worse at each iteration. More bloat, more spying, more locked-down for user “security”. And for what? The dubious benefit of being “compatible” with other shitheel software providers like Adobe who use their monopoly power to stranglehold the corporate and professional media sectors? Toeachizown but IDK how anyone can use Windows by choice. The small amount I have to use it at work is torture enough.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      it’s one of the many reasons that comprise a pattern of behavior whereby Microsoft makes Windows worse at each iteration.

      It’s a complete no-op for me. I also suspect, although I have nothing to back this up, that they chose this because it’s a relatively unused feature.