• Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is, unlike text (like on here and Mastodon), video files can become extremely large, so you’d have to have a pretty big amount of storage to replace YouTube, federated or not.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, that’s mostly what their cost is. Servers and storage.

        I wonder how much YouTube depends on cloud storage right now.

        • TehWorld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          100%? Do you think that there’s some box sitting under someone’s desk hosting Youtube? Hint: They’re owned by Google.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I work in IT, I know how storage works. I just don’t know if they’re on prem hosting or primarily using a private cloud service.

            I mean they have the money, might as well offload to specialists where you can, right? I wouldn’t be building new infrastructure day and night when I could just have a B to B contract with AWS or something.