Statcounter, a website that tracks the market share of web browsers, operating systems, and search engines, is reporting that Linux on the desktop has over 4% market share for the very first time (Statcounter records ChromeOS as a separate operating system despite being based on Linux). Statcounter doesn’t provide any explanation about why the market share has increased but we can speculate what’s going on.

Linux’s march to its 4.03% market share has been a steady process ever since the final months of 2020 when Linux held just 1.53% of desktop market share. One of the biggest contributors to the growth of Linux is likely the stringent hardware requirements of Windows 11.

  • Yuumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The insane requirements of Win11 (and the added Ai features) are definitely factors for me to switch to Linux

      • Yuumi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Right so I haven’t switched just yet, I’m waiting on Win10 EOL because there is still stuff I use that is windows only (Adobe suite [ I fucking hate gimp ] and some games)

        However, I did look into distro stability, and what apps are avalabile. Everything else I use IS either Linux native or runs great on Linux.

        Inevitably, when I switch, I will miss Photoshop and not having to tinker with making games work

        • Fisch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          9 months ago

          You should look into Krita. Not a replacement for Photoshop but I find it more intuitive than GIMP, at least.

          • Yuumi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh yeah 100%, I’ve used Krita before on windows and it’s enough to cover most of my use cases, also it’s by the KDE community, which I adore <3

            • Fisch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              This is very interesting, I think I’ll try that out. I wanted to give GIMP a real try at some point anyway.

          • Horsey@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Affinity Photo is also really really good. I’d imagine it’s high profile and will have good support in wine.

            • KarthNemesis@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Affinity absolutely does not work on linux easily, or well. Some people have gotten a barely-functioning app working in bottles, and reportedly some have gotten it “mostly” working through wine, but it is through a convoluted process that will be beyond many newer linux users and prone to errors. (And you have to dig through 100 pages of the affinity forum to try to figure it out.)

              It doesn’t support hardware acceleration and seems to tend to be glitchy and crash often.
              Which… is still a vastly better state than the last time I checked, at least, ha. But that’s been progress over the course of 4 years.

              I think this page is the best bet for even trying: https://codeberg.org/Wanesty/affinity-wine-docs

              It’s legitimately the only thing I miss from windows. I might try again with this installer when I have the energy… sigh hahah

        • Kory@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          People often forget that they also often have to tinker with making games work in Windows, because they are more familiar with the OS and get it done faster. Also I think you’d be surprised how many games just run without any tinkering at all nowadays. But then there are some that don’t run at all, mostly due to invasive rootkit ‘anti-cheats’. That’s no real loss for me, I wouldn’t install something like that on a Windows machine either.

          • Yuumi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think the largest extent I went with messing around was using a Locale Emulator for a Japanese game, never had to do more than run the exe.

            On Linux it’s a bit of a “will it run under proton?” type game, but I’m not really thaaaaaaat bothered by it. Also fuck invasive anticheats, only shit games use it anyway.

            • whatsgoingdom@rollenspiel.forum
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Also the steam deck helped massively with game compatibility. The only game I had to tinker with (and didn’t get to work) so far is a closed alpha. I still run a dual boot setup, but only use the Windows partition for work (office suite needed). Fmstrat/Winapps (found on GitHub) is a good enough way to use Office for smaller tasks so I don’t always have to boot up the Windows partition.

        • Corr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Most games so far I haven’t had to tinker with. I just switched a few months ago and it’s been smooth sailing. That said, I can’t speak to using any photo editing software.

          I’m keeping windows on my computer now for a piece of software for programming my non-custom keyboard and other miscellaneous windows only things like updating Xbox controller firmware. But it has been a blast and being able to make the PC work for me instead of the other way around has been an extremely positive experience.

        • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m a game dev, so I’ll have to at least keep around either a Windows VM or a dual boot system, since Windows is still very popular.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I just switched from 10 myself.

        I started on NixOS for some reason… that was a pain in the ass. Every time the machine locked for inactivity it killed my session and I had to relaunch all my apps.

        I now have ZorrinOS installed and I’m much more at home on a Ubuntu/Debian base. I’m not seeing the same session issue anymore - it resumes as you would expect.

        The install for Zorrin has an “install with Nvidia drivers” option (others may too - idk) which made it easy.

        I haven’t had to use it yet but I guess wine is there if I have a Windows only app I have to run.

      • TangoUndertow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would install Manjaro. It runs KDE, which is super familiar, and maybe more polished than Windows. And it is Arch-based, which means you have access to AUR apps, which makes finding programs super easy. It’s like if the MS app store actually had every program on it.

        Keeping the explanations simple.

        Don’t start with Ubuntu/Gnome. The desktop is way too weird, and app repository is limited.

        Don’t start with Mint or Cinnamon or LxDE. Linux nerds will recommend these, but they feel “old” and are not really lighter on resources than KDE.

        Highly recommend Arch-based distros. AUR feels like a miracle coming from the Windows paradigm of tracking down installer EXEs and MSIs.

    • doors_3@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I had been on Linux since 2016 when I finally installed Windows 11 on my newer shitty laptop which had a bug that was apparently unresolved no matter what distro or config I tried. But Windows’ issues like it’s famous update times, the modern distasteful UI(in my opinion) and inclusion of more and more features that the user didn’t ask for send me back to Linux. And with Copilot being forced on users, I don’t think Microsoft is respecting their customers choices.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      What requirements do they have? I remember requiring a TPM module which was quite absurd.

      • Yuumi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah TMP, my CPU doesn’t have it, and I’m not going to get a new motherboard and CPU just for a shittier Windows experience.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        What does TPM even do that it is needed over UEFI secure boot? Validate individual hardware components?

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          for gaming purposes, it can be used for hardeare level bans that cant be bypassed like Hardware IDs. tpms are tied to the chip (or cpu if using fTPM) so a hardware ban would effectively be making said tom module or cpu outright banned, requiring the user to get a new one if they wanted to continue to play.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Whaaaaat?!?!?!?!?

            I honestly hadn’t looked into it and thought it was some sort of secure key management for any crypto process?

            Maybe it is as well, but fuck hardware banning.

            • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              prpgrams basically use it for authentication, it has other uses too, but is effectively a tool to verify if the computer is the correct person, as no other device would be capable of immitating and create the message they sent. because of that, its effectively a hardware ID, attached to the tpm module, or more commonly for consumers, the CPU.

              banning said device would effectively be a hardware ban. which would be used by compeotitive online games to dissuade cheaters an evergrowing problem with lack of solutions.

              • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I imagine that could get pretty dystopian pretty quickly.

                Permanently block the CPU from the internet through a shared ISP ban list?

                • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  the person writing the software would have to allow for the check to happen i would think. the only game im aware that actively uses it is Valorant.