• null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You say they didn’t, and then go on to make a point they didn’t make…

    They didn’t comment on funding whatsoever. Plenty of open-source software gets funding, and not all closed source software gets funding.

    The issue is with bullying and burnout. Nothing to do with being closed or open source.

    • SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m sorry that I’m apparently not getting my point across to you

      Proprietary software is often made by a corporation, who pays full-time developers. Those full-time developers are given a salary to work on that software. That salary is normally more than what open-source devs make off their software. The team who is paid to work full-time on the software will patch issues faster (theoretically)

      I bet you’ll find something wrong with this, but I don’t care

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s nothing wrong with what you’re saying, I’m not challenging the point you’re making here.

        I’m challenging your ability to mind-read and ascribe that point to a different commenter.