• boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Tbh I am fully behind KDE as flagship desktop. Dealing with GNOME users problems all day in the forum, KDE is just better for usability?

    GNOME is reduced over the amount that makes sense. KDE could use a bit of reduction, but not as much as GNOMEs. People need the Terminal or random extensions for basic things, this is not a good experience.

    On the other hand, GNOME and KDE both have really nice features, GNOME with their Microsoft integrations being particularly powerful (their account system works at all, unlike KDEs which I think nobody uses. But when using Thunderbird, which has standalone Exchange support, you dont use that account system anyways so it doesnt matter again).

    Also GNOME has like all their apps on Flathub. GNOME Boxes is particularly crazy, having sandboxed virtualization. This means you can mix match GNOME Flatpaks on a KDE desktop without any problems, KDE even handles the theming for you. On GNOME on the other hand… it actively breaks Qt apps, its insane.

    So I think GNOME has some great apps (snapshot, decoder, simplescan, carburetor, celluloid …) but you can install them anywhere.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Dealing with GNOME users problems all day in the forum, KDE is just better for usability?

      It seems not unimaginable that whichever is more popular (/the default) will have more people reporting problems in the forum, regardless of how good it is?

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah okay. I dont deny that I would also prefer maintaining and QA-ing GNOME over KDE, as its just so much smaller.

        But stuff like “there are no right click options for zip” are pretty crazy. Or the total lack of templates by default, for stuff like text files.

    • barbara@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      GNOME looks better out of the box and configuring KDE can be very tricky. There are also a lot of outdated “addons” for KDE and you need some in order to get what you want. extensions are better integrsted in KDE but it’s not like KDE has everything out of the box. I’d love to see more KDE support.

      • andrewd18@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think KDE looks great out of the box, includes all the extensions I want, and is easy to configure.

        • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          includes all the extensions I want

          This is what people dont get. Different DEs best serve different people. We should always push to have a better experience but sniping between DEs makes no sense

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        True. KDEs virtual desktops are also basically unusable for me, idk I just dont see them so they are not used.

        There are pros and cons. Its simply a tie, I stay with KDE because the lack of some things (like close buttons with the hitbox in the very edge) would annoy me.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is my issue with KDE. Virtual Desktops are too unnecessarily convoluted to use. Even Alt-Tabbing is a pain if you have anything over 1 single workspace. I decided to daily drive KDE for a few months to give it a good chance, because before I would usually just go back to Gnome after a few days. It’s been 2 months now, and I don’t think I can take much more of it.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Their Plasma 6 overview is great, just needs the panel displayed or even an app menu and it could be similar to GNOME.

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I actually tweaked it to be more “gnome-like”, but the desktops are a hot mess. At the end of the day, it’s a matter of taste, and I’m a huge fan of Gnome’s simplicity.

              • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                I don’t really get this but I’m going to assume it’s that my workflow is just different than yours.

                I have keyboard shortcuts I’m happy with that let me navigate my virtual desktops as desired and place widows on them. If I wasn’t happy with those shortcuts I could change them. I can see having different preferences, or etc, but what makes it a hot mess exactly?

                • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  When I Alt-tab it always goes to the apps open on the next desktop, and never shows the apps on the current desktop. So, say I have Vivaldi and KWrite on desktop 1, and Brave and LibreOffice Calc on desktop 2.

                  If I’m on desktop 1 on Vivaldi and Alt-tab, it’ll move to Desktop 2 and move between Brave and Calc, and but will never show anything from Desktop 1, until I release the Alt key and Alt-tab again.

                  Now, for me it’s even worse since I have 3 Desktops instead of 2.

                  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Have you dug into the options at all? If I’m visualizing what you are describing correctly, I think spending some time here should solve your issues.

                    edit - specifically the options in the lower right

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Agree on the looks. Even though GNOME is literally a “no blur” macOS clone, which I also dont find really inspired

        • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          My father uses a mac and it is plenty different. Maybe the design philosophy of MacOS and GNOME are similar but the implementation is very different.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            What is different? I think GNOME diverged a bit more, by removing window buttons, desktop icons, the dock etc. And they dont use blur and transparency at all.

            But with dash to dock, blur my shell and some decoration manipulation changer it is very similar.

            Not that I dont think this makes sense (I dont, as having a dock but also a top panel wastes space) but it is not really a unique workflow

            • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well the way the workspaces and the overview work is completely different which means that workflow is night and day different. Not to mention how the differences in how floating windows work, what role the top panel plays and things like that.

              They might look similar just like how KDE ‘looks’ similar to windows but that is only true at the surface level. The way the desktops behave and hence the workflow is very different in each case

            • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Removing window buttons ? the trio of buttons for controlling window size ? or is this something else

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I never understand the “Gnome is a MacOS clone” thing.

          Other than a black bar at the top which has the time and a few system icons, what to they really have in common?

          The workflow is entirely different, the dock is almost always hidden in Gnome, MacOS has no activities view, Gnome doesn’t even use the icon in the top left as a start-menu.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yes it is MacOS with the dock hidden. And without window buttons. And they are not on the left and not damn colorblind unfriendly.

            I mean the top bar is the exact same, the app drawer, the workspaces. The quicksettings. They just removed even more stuff.

            Edit: there are many things about them that are different, but the overall design seems similar to me. I think GNOME is way more usable and makes more sense. But still, having a top bar already is kinda odd and I think using that already makes you “macOS like”.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              No it isn’t.

              The top bar isn’t the exact same, it’s extremely different. Gnome doesn’t use a global menu, doesn’t have a start menu, doesn’t have the clock on the right. The only similarity is the bar being at the top and containing stuff like WiFi and battery icons.

              The window decorations are different. The UI looks different. Gnome doesn’t have a permanent dock, doesn’t have stuff on the desktop. Window management works in a very different way, MacOS doesn’t have the activities view, etc.

              They are not alike.