Bro he’s got like eleven lambos bro he wears his Rolex in the shower bro it’s got real diamonds bro he has all the video game consoles and extra controllers bro
brooooooooo
That Wojack is brilliant.
Also, I wonder what physical shape the uncle is in? I’m betting terrible.
What shape? Alpha, obviously. Pointy up top and progressively wider as you go down.
Tatejack?
Lmao. So his logic was
my wife is too ugly to fuck
He deserves the divorce, good for her.
Everyone looks the same in the dark. Pretty people are nice to look at. Marry for things that take up more than 20 minutes(maybe) of your week. Sad they didn’t realize this.
Visual communication is incredibly important. I think I’ve had sex in the dark like… less than 1% of the time. You’re either trying to keep up a rapport to maintain their enthusiastic future availability or emotionally invested and attempting to maintain reciprocity. Unless you’re both fairly charming and willing to lower your standards, lights are worth keeping on. Sex is just as intrinsically tied to the social contract as anything else.
That said, yeah, marry for personality imo.
It could have been fine if he didn’t have a “change the rules because I’m losing” mentality.
Yeah jokes on him 40 year old polyamorous women pull like crazy
We are friends with a 53 year old widow, she is physically unremarkable, chubby, has kids in college. She has sex with multiple guys a week and details her adventures to my wife over text. These guys range from 25 to 44 yrs old. Women will always get laid more than men. If they want it, they can have it.
Yeah I’m a 29 year old woman and there’s a woman in her 50s that I’ve been making out with. It’s kinda weird that her kids are my age, but she’s hot af so… and yeah she’s chubby, but it works for her.
Women will always get laid more than men.
If we discount homosexual relationships (since the conversation focuses on heterosexuals), for a woman to have sex, there needs to be a man to have sex with her, and vice versa, so men and women should get laid equally.
Uh no. It’s not 1-1, it’s 1-to-many.
Due to Fisher’s Principle, we know that there’s roughly as many women as men. So why don’t you go and take a population of 5 men and 5 women, and show how they can be partnered up in such a way that each woman is on average connected to more men than vice versa. You’ll quickly find it impossible, and that’s because it is mathematically impossible.
The rise and fall of this grift has been such a gift to me. It has introduced some of the goofiest characters and goofiest feuds. I have had so many delightful conversations stemming from this shit. What a time to be alive.
this grift has fallen? seems alive and kicking to me
I still hear chuds at work talk about his “wisdom”.
Really? What line of work are you in, if you don’t mind me asking.
I am in the electricity business. ⚡️⚡️
