• KingScoob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow, the ‘enshittification’ of the internet is really taking off now. Sites are either already dodgy, or well on their way there!

    I know this has been a bit of a slow burn for a while now, but it really feels like it’s all coming to a head suddenly.

    • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We really gotta back decentralized platforms if we don’t want everything to become an overmonetized hellscape where all information and communication is skewed to suit business interests. I wouldn’t pay for Reddit Gold and Twitter Blue but I should send some money to the Lemmy, Kbin and Mastodon folks.

  • Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh sweet, it’s dot.com 2.0. Grab your popcorn, it’s time for the internet to implode… again! Never ever underestimate shareholders’ willingness to self-destruct a product for short-term profit.

    • KingScoob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Similar to what happened after the last dot com crash, it’ll be interesting to see how the internet evolves and what comes next.

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s called fiduciary duty and it’s why every mega company sucks.

      Cut costs by replacing cashiers with self checkout? Write a fat check to the shareholders! Then, shoplifting is becoming an even bigger issue from the self checkout… Cut costs again by preventing shoplifting by having people man the self checkout! Write another fat check to the shareholders!

      Nevermind that it would have been easier and cheaper to just keep the system we had. Looking at you, Target.

      • Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, but self-checkouts are good. Dunno how they use them at target, but at shops I go to they allow me to get to the shop, grab what I need and leave within 5 minutes.

        And not so sure with cheaper. Again from my experience, shops have a setup of 6 self-checkouts per 1 employee.

          • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re only good if they pass the savings of not having to pay a person to ring up your groceries onto you

            I’m with the other person on this one. Self checkouts have really reduced the queues where I live. They’re much more compact than the cash registers and the shop near me basically doubled its cash register capacity because of them. I rarely have to wait in a queue these days.

            Tesco even has a scan as you shop service which is really convenient. You get a barcode scanner before you start shopping, then scan all products you want to buy and place them directly in your bags. At the checkout, you scan a barcode attached to the checkout machine, it prompts you to pay, you pay and leave. All your things are already bagged.

      • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fiduciary duty is an absolute circus. Obligating companies to maximize profits at the expense of the wider society is the exact opposite of how law should work.

      • rodneylives@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remember! You can’t say “fiduciary duty” without saying “douche” and “doody.”

    • Rannoch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forreal, what’s going on? Why does it seem like so many separate sites are suddenly so much worse/going downhill quickly?

      • GallowBooby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Our entire Internet enjoyment has been heavily subsidized by venture capital for the last 30 years which hoped to monetize us more than they have been able (believe it or not).

        Now they are calling in their bets…

      • Ragerist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Apparently they have been living on life-support.

        I can’t claim to fully understand how it worked, but apparently as long as sites could show user growth they could attract investments, but with inflation causing interest rates to go up (and other economy hocus pocus) , that money is quickly drying up.

        I don’t know if the investors believed that if the user base could grow large enough, someone would buy the companies, or they suddenly could come up with some fantastic monetization of said user-base.

        Now as companies are listed on the stock exchange, and facing the falling investor interest, they are expected to react (aggressively) to secure future revenue.

        • CumBroth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Adding to what you said about interest rates: We’re at the end of a long period of cheap borrowing (very low interest rates) during which overvalued assets were used as collateral to secure loans for investments. These propped-up assets are beginning to drop to their true (intrinsic) values. In other words, speculation and irresponsible practices were propping up a house of cards that’s starting to collapse, and now investors are scrambling to cash in or cut losses wherever they can. So they’re deciding that time has run out for online platforms that promised to grow but still haven’t hit their numbers/monetization goals.

          tl;dr: Infinite money glitch got patched (because it was wreaking all sorts of financial havoc) and now investors need to end life-support for risky/unprofitable investments.

          • Matdan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Streaming fell apart quickly, it’s so hard to find anything decent on most of them. It’s become clear they can’t curate new content as readily.

            • Ziro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’ll be even worse when there are no new series to watch because all of the people who write them are on strike. The content mines are drying up.

        • Technotica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The internet was far more enjoyable 20 years ago, so if content goes back to being user hosted instead of corporation hosted I’ll be happy.

          • Ragerist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. But I think spam-bots, especially backed with ChatGPT or better level AI will prevent real user generated content, on that level from 20 years ago, to resurface.

      • ugh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Billionaires bought the internet and now they’re realizing that it isn’t profitable.

  • -V0lD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, twitter, Reddit, Imgur, and now Gfycat are all killing itself

    Has the internet bubble finally popped?

  • The times, they are a changin’…

    I’ve watched the internet evolve since I first logged on to CompuServe in 1990. I don’t think I have seen such a dramatic and fast change since the beginning of the WWW over crap like CompuServ.

  • Paradox@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gfycat was the only good gif hoster. The rest, tenor, giphy, etc, are all corporate buzzfeed slop, that were primarily used by dimwits to decorate their shitty blog posts with (remember the various reddit admin feature announcements that had like 300 stupid gifs in them?)

    • cats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a very informative article, it barely hints at why this is happening. Presumably Snapchat wants to shut it down, and rebuild it themselves?

      Popular animated gifs hosting service gfycat.com is shutting down on September 1, 2023 and all hosted content will no longer be accessible at that point.

      The service is one of many that is used by Internet users to upload and share animated gifs on the Internet. Founded more than eight years ago, Gfycat has risen to popularity and is widely used in some Internet communities.

      The official website of the service informs users about the shutdown. There, the company writes: “The Gfycat service is being discontinued. Please save or delete your Gfycat content by visiting https://www.gfycat.com and logging in to your account. After September 1, 2023, all Gfycat content and data will be deleted from gfycat.com” Existing users have time until September 1, 2023 to save their uploaded animated gifs for safekeeping. On September 2, 2023, all data will be deleted from the company’s servers and will no longer be accessible.

      Any image embedded on third-party sites will no longer display either and show an error instead. Uploaders may download their animated gifs from the service and upload it to another, and then change the embed codes of their posts to keep the images visible.

      Gyfcat banned adult content in 2019 in the app and created a new service, called redgifs, for that. This service was later sold to another company.

      The service was acquired last year by Snap, makers of Snapchat. Gfycat is not the only animated gif service that has been acquired recently. Meta, owner of Facebook, tried to acquire the popular service Giphy but was blocked to go forward by regulators. Meta had to sell Giphy at a $260 million loss to Shutterstock as a consequence.

      Snap has not made an official announcement regarding the shutdown of Gfycat.

      Here are some Gfycat alternatives

      • Giphy – While now part of Shutterstock, Giphy remains available at the moment on the Internet.
      • Imgur – One of the oldest standing sites that allows users to upload animated gifs and images.
      • Kikliko – Animated Gifs with sounds support is what sets this site apart from many others.
      • Tenor – Another site that allows users to upload animated gifs and embed them into third-party sites.

      Now You: do you use another site for hosting animated gifs?”

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The other comment already mentioned that Discord uses Tenor, but you’re probably thinking of Giphy, which is another service similar to Tenor. Gfycat is a bit different, and was more like Imgur.

  • Jay@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kinda glad GIFs are dying… they were beyond annoying specially in discussions. didn’t help that reddit started incorporating them into the comment section.

  • Vertelleus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what’s the open-source alternative for gfycat? We got a trend started here let’s keep it going!

    • elscallr@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with something like gfycat isn’t the source code, it’s the storage and bandwidth. That shit is expensive and there’s no way to do it for free without showing ads and not go broke.

  • Lifetrip@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s crazy. Things are moving fast these days. It seems every private company owning a big website is trying to squeeze money out of user or closing.