Shall we trust LM defining legal definitions, deepfake in this case? It seems the state rep. is unable to proof read the model output as he is “really struggling with the technical aspects of how to define what a deepfake was.”
Shall we trust LM defining legal definitions, deepfake in this case? It seems the state rep. is unable to proof read the model output as he is “really struggling with the technical aspects of how to define what a deepfake was.”
A bill draft, which eventually/maybe gets signed and is public by its very nature is sensitive?
Agreed on principle, but I don’t see how what he did was wrong…other than calling ChatGPT a subject matter expert.