While Jitsi is open-source, most people use the platform they provide, meet.jit.si, for immediate conference calls. They have now introduced a “Know Your Customer” policy and require at least one of the attendees to log in with a Facebook, Github (Microsoft), or Google account.

One option to avoid this is to self-host, but then you’ll be identifiable via your domain and have to maintain a server.

As a true alternative to Jitsi, there’s jami.net. It is a decentralized conference app, free open-source, and account creation is optional. It’s available for all major platforms (Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android), including on F-Droid.

  • cerevant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because these three provide federated login most email providers do not.

    • Smoke@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t think I’d unironically hear “This is an advantage because now one company controls all your logins” as a reply to privacy concerns.

      • cerevant@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t say that. Security and privacy are nearly opposites. This is a security decision.