This is a genuine question.
I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.
P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let’s be civil.
And if you’re a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.
The CEO lived by the sword and died by the sword. The amount of suffering and death needed to feed that pig…
There were no swords involved. He was murdered for no reason.
In the US, if your insurance say no to your claim you can die, pay out of pocket, or hope its not that bad and you survive.
The company he ran has a record of saying no 30% of the time. That’s a lot of dead people that guy signed off on to pinch a penny. He earned it.
=)))))))