floofloof@lemmy.ca to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up1803arrow-down19cross-posted to: medicine@mander.xyz
arrow-up1794arrow-down1external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square113fedilinkcross-posted to: medicine@mander.xyz
minus-squarekernelle@0d.gslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down5·2 days agoScience doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
minus-squarezeca@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 day agoscience needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
minus-squarekernelle@0d.gslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoScience doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·1 day agoNo it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
Science doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
science needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
Science doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
No it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
It can, but it shouldn’t.