• Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s quite an interesting insight into what kind of thing Musk himself feels is a great insult (hence he is susceptible to it) as well as how much Musk thinks his opinion counts for people such as the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs, all of which dovetails with the idea that the guy suffers from both Megalomania and Narcisistic Personality Disorder.

      For any reasonably well adjusted person in a position of responsability such as being the Foreign Minister of a country the size of Poland (or, frankly, for anybody self-aware and self-confident), being called “small man” by somebody like Elon Musk is roughly the equivalent in importance to being barked at by a dog that cannot actually harm you.

      • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        For a person who is afraid of being assassinated, he’s pissing off a lot of people with the resources who could get him assassinated.

  • adm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    When the war was turning in Ukraine’s favor and they were about to push into Russia, he shut it off and crippled their counter offensive. I remember. Fuck Elon and fuck starlink.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They’re presumably talking about the Kursk Oblast. Edit: probably not, see responses.

        • altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          IIRC that was long after that. The initial shutoff of Starlink happened around the explosions targeting the Crimean bridge and them introducing their naval drones.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Which is why Starlink needs to be confiscated and managed by NATO. Somebody has to operate it, and it should be an entity who is on the side of Freedom amd Democracy.

        • Mandrilleren@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure it is. You just confiscate the infrastructure that operates them here on earth, and order their employees to comply.

          I don’t think that this would be a good idea, but it is definitely doable.

          • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            When it comes to stuff like this, the USA is like a tax heaven: outside of international jurisdiction and never signed any cooperation agreement with foreign powers. The USA is the best place to run shady business right now

    • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Musk and Starlink aren’t major difference makers in this war. It’s a years-long slog where the main takeaway is “cheap and reliable in volume is more than a match for the newest and fanciest.” It hasn’t been on the verge of turning in Ukraine’s favor since the end of Russia’s initial push towards Kyiv.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have a buddy who’s been eating/sleeping/breathing this war and, hands down, cheap and reliable FPV drones have changed how warfare is done. It’s the main reason why trench warfare came back, and one of the things that fucked Russia up in the mid-term. Apparently they have a long-standing strategy that involves armor and something something something that my buddy explained and I don’t remember, but because there’s always drones watching every inch of the front at all times, Ukraine was able to bust that strat by being able to dial in artillery fast and early. At least, that’s how I’m remembering what was explained.

        • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not rly the ability of drones to observe that makes them so strong, but the ability to attack. Russia’s air defense is unable to stop a drone swarm, especially because its something the world hasn’t yet seen. And if two drones armed with explosives take down a bigass helicopter, that’s a massive win.

          A few weeks ago, Ukraine decimated an oil refinery on russian territory with a swarm of drones of which only 40% were taken down by the russian air defense.

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          cheap and reliable in volume

          cheap and reliable FPV drones have changed how warfare is done

          We’re in agreement here. I’m not saying new technology is useless, I’m saying there aren’t any wonder weapons (or wonder communication systems) that would have given Ukraine a decisive advantage.

          Long-term, it’s still a matter of which side can outproduce the other when it comes to the cheap and reliable equipment we’re talking about. At this point that’s clearly Russia.

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Everyone who disagrees with me is a Russian” was ran into the ground five years ago, get new material.

          But yes, a steel cage offering significant protection against much more modern technology is a great example of what I’m talking about.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh no I’m hearing from people that wa a technical glitch.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Close. There was a geobarrier that he refused to remove. Because attacks against Russia are aggression.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s weird: Musk and Trump are doing exactly what one would if they were Russian assets, bent on destroying western alliances… You don’t have to believe all the evidence that they are… Just imagine that these 2 billionaires are compromised. What would they do at this exact moment in history…?

  • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can’t fucking stand that douche. I wish Luigi would visit that cocksucker. Man, that feels good to say. Fuck Reddit too!

    • CritFail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Look at it this way, if they did indeed arrest and frame an innocent man for convenience, maybe he will.

    • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      It starts in the middle. It’s smaller and indented because it’s then being quoted by the Polish minister on top. Then Elon, fuckwit that he is, responds at the bottom.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It was never meant to be used like this, and Twitter just never changed it out of pure stubborn bullshit

          The original idea is that you’d retweet something, say something like “check out this bullshit” and then read the re-tweet, but people regularly use it as a reply feature that boosts to their audience instead and so this UI insanity happens

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    He also challenged Zuck to a cage match and chickened out when Zuck accepted. They’re both pieces of shit.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      He even chickened out of his recent offer to come on the Daily Show and debate Jon Stewart! He’s a Nazi coward even when it’s just talking…

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Did he officially bow out then? Jon gave him all the conditions he wanted too…

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol I forgot about that! Yeah fuck em both of course, but I feel like most folks would put their money on the ex-KGB agent who seized and kept control of freakin’ Russia over nepo-baby “gamer”, “engineer” Musk. What a goofy threat. And I say that as a middling gamer and engineer myself lol

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        feel like most folks would put their money on the ex-KGB agent who seized and kept contr

        Putin is 5’ 7", like 160 lbs, and 70 years old. Elon is 6’2", probably 200 lbs, and 52 years old.

        I don’t think fitness and training can overcome 20 years, 50 lbs, and a full head of height.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          and a full head of height.

          I thought you were gonna say “full head of transplanted hair,” but I was disappointed. I’ve seen tiny guys take on bigger dudes when they have more skill. The age thing is more what I might think of as an advantage for that doughy chud.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Musk is so fucked up he’s gonna make some noises, groan, then shit himself after the first attempt at a swing

          70’s isn’t too shabby in this day and age for a well kept physique, it’s 80+ the rot cements itself.

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Tweet linked in the OP is Musk claiming that he challenged Putin to a fist fight.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t respect Putin very much, but I am 1000 percent sure that a former KGB agent will whoop Musks ass. Apart from that, wtf is he trying to show with challenging Putin to physical combat. What does that have to do with Ukraine?

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hate Zuck but in this match I’m thinking if it’s not mutually assured destruction, then I might root for Zuck. Elon is becoming a very big problem.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The 600 series had rubber skin. We spotted them easy, but these are new. They look human…sweat, bad breath, everything.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s faster, cheaper, and on the tech side more reliable (definitely not politically reliable though).

      • Inktvip@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Starlink has enough uplink to be able to handle live video streams and a latency low enough to do this with simple tools.

        I’m not sure if that still happens, but I’ve seen some pictures of Ukrainian command bunkers literally getting drone feeds using discord screen share.

      • learningduck@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        My guess is better coverage and latency with its sheer number of satellites.

        They use low earth orbit, which require them to use more satellites, but lowered latency.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Technically, and this is purely semantics, coverage is the major downside to starlink. They are faster, though.

          The coverage of satellites has an exponential factor of the distance of that satellite to earth. If you had the satellite further out then its signal could reach a wider area before being cut off by the curvature of the earth. However, as the distance increases, so does latency.

      • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Now, I don’t know, but I would assume its the latency. Starlink has a (impressively) low ping of < 100ms, while existing alternatives usually have 600ms+. Now, that’s only relevant if they are using it for stuff like flying drones.

    • krf@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      As much as I hate Elmo, you can fold Starlink terminal flat and put in a backpack and it weights around 6 kilogram and costs around $500, Eutelsat „portable” OW70L is fucking chonky dome that weights 30 kilos, costs $2000 and needs to be transported in a car. They need to seriously up their game, and do it fast.

  • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Is there any evidence that Musk is right about Poland only paying “a tiny fraction of the cost”? Seems a strange comment to make

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        for the next 3.8 years Now now, we should stop pretending that anything could happen in 3.8 years to stop that.

        They’ll stop it in a few months when Putin tells them to.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          What I meant is, they will be prevented from going bankrupt either way – whether the money hole gets filled by a massive contract or closed by Putin’s no-fly request.

  • Numinous_Ylem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nationalize SpaceX and deport Musk to South Africa where he belongs.

    (Ok maybe nationalize it under the next administration… if there is a next one)

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        VP has the same requirements as President, which exclude Musk because he isn’t a citizen by birth. Musk was essentially put in the highest possible position he could be that didn’t require him to be elected or confirmed by Congress.

        Which is why he needed a puppet to be President for him. I don’t know that he ideally wanted a puppet he’d have to time-share with Putin, but that’s the puppet he bought.

        And I firmly believe that aside from the occasional going off script as a kind of tantrum that Trump is entirely a puppet - consider the narcissism and desire to exude power that he has, and then look at him in the photos of that meeting where Elon was in the Oval Office with little Kevlar Musk and just how defeated Trump looks. He knows his choices were win office or be buried by the courts, and he signed whatever deals with whatever devils were necessary to guarantee it happened, he’s owned by Elon and Putin, he knows it and that eats at him.