I would understand if Canonical want a new cow to milk, but why are developers even agreeing to this? Are they out of their minds?? Do they actually want companies to steal their code? Or is this some reverse-uno move I don’t see yet? I cannot fathom any FOSS project not using the AGPL anymore. It’s like they’re painting their faces with “here, take my stuff and don’t contribute anything back, that’s totally fine”

  • easily3667@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This can happen.

    The flip side is noone uses it. I’ve never worked at any company that allowed even lgpl code to be used. If it has a commercial license we’ll buy it, if not…find another tool.

    Lawyers are terrified of gpl and will do anything to avoid going to court over it, including forcing you to rip code out and do a clean room rewrite.

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      In my Company, we do use such code. But its mainly because we distribute our own Propriatary Linux OS.

      We sometimes need to change such code, so we just put it on Github as a fork.