How do they come up with the most confusing naming schemes on the planet? You would think that making it easy to identify which product is which would boost sales, or someone at least has the sanity to make it easy to understand.

(i.e. CPUs, laptop processors, USB standard, most smartphones, monitors, anything made by Sony that’s not a Playstation…)

  • Aux@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    A simpler name would require a trademark. Go on, try to trademark a nice name. Or better yet - hundreds of them each year.

    Randomly looking numbers and characters cannot be trademarked (one of the good examples was Intel’s move from x86 naming to Celeron and Pentium as they couldn’t prevent others calling their CPUs 486), so everyone can use them freely.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      If I understand correctly, Intel attempted to trademark “586” and AMD objected because it would prevent them from using a consistent part numbering scheme. The courts agreed foring Intel to make up a brand name. They wanted something that sounded sciencey and technological, like the name of an element, hence the -ium suffix, and it was the fifth major version of the x86 platform, fiveium? No…penta…Pentium!