I don’t like smartphones. I use a dumbphone.

But this is a wonderful initiative.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      How else would they push their mediocre reviewed Bluetooth headsets and ear buds?

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      70
      ·
      16 hours ago

      my phone has a headphone jack, my phone before that had a headphone jack. Wanna guess how often I used it? Zero because I have decent bluetooth headphones

      • vala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This is fine if you don’t care about having the best audio quality and lowest latency possible.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          not just that. with a jack, you can use your phone as a perfect mic for your PC. its also better in terms of privacy as you don’t blast “IM HERE” signals that every other shop has a tracking device for logging them. I would guess majority of bluetooth audio devices don’t even support mac address randomization

          @tetris11@lemmy.ml

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I would guess majority of bluetooth audio devices don’t even support mac address randomization

            Wouldn’t that be a nightmare for pairing? The device wakes and tries to connect to the last device it was paired to, only to find unknown vendors

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I feel like latency only matters if you’re realtime gaming. In any other situation the video just syncs to the audio.

          As for quality AptX-HD is decent for low bitrates even at 24-bit, and LDAC remains excellent for anything higher.
          Unless you’re listening to high-res FLAC (in which case, god help your earphone impedance when listening to normal songs), I doubt the loss is audible

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Wanna know how many times I played a piano in the past 20 years?

        Zero. Clearly they shouldn’t exist.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            You’re not making sense.

            Your position was that someone else is wrong to desire audio jacks, because you personally don’t need one after spaffing money on some Bluetooth earphones.

            My point – which I thought was very obvious, but apparently you missed it – was that just because you don’t see the value of something doesn’t mean others don’t or that it shouldn’t exist.

            I don’t have a piano, and I don’t know why you think I do.

            My entire metaphor is that I don’t play or have a piano, but I recognise that it’s stupid for me to discourage others from having them solely because I personally don’t have or want one.

            • tetris11@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              I’m a bit confused by your metaphor then (and thanks for the constructive insults, brings me back to the old reddit days…), since why take issue with something you dont own or use in the first place? Is the piano the headjack, or is it the bluetooth?

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 minutes ago

                I didn’t insult you, I remarked that you didn’t appear to have understood my comment, and by the looks of it you still don’t.

                Apologies if you’re upset by my comment. That was not my intent. I was just pointing out the absurdity of your judgemental comment.

                I’m not the one taking issue with something I don’t own. That’s my entire point. You are discouraging someone from wanting something just because you personally don’t value it.

                The piano is the headphone jack.

                You don’t need a headphone jack, and feel the need to disparage others who do. “I don’t use a headphone jack, so you shouldn’t want a phone with one.”

                Similarly, I don’t need a piano. However, I don’t go around telling people they shouldn’t want/play one, because I recognise that the things I want in my life are different to the things other people want in theirs.

      • Scroll Responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        my phone has a headphone jack, my phone before that had a headphone jack. Wanna guess how often I used it? Zero because I have decent bluetooth headphones

        That’s just like your opinion man

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 hours ago

        My last phone had a headphone jack. Wanna guess how often I used it? All the time! And that was despite having decent Bluetooth headphones.

        I loved wearing my cans when mowing the lawn because it cut down on the noise, and I also used them when laying in bed since they had much better audio. I would use my Bluetooth headphones the rest of the time because they were more convenient.

        My new phone doesn’t have headphone jack, and I’m super bummed.

          • Asetru@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            USB-C to headphone jack dongles suck. You lose them easily, you can’t charge your phone if they’re connected and if you disconnect your headphones the device still behaves as if they’re plugged in. It’s so much less convenient and on the other hand there’s just no downside to having a dedicated headphone jack, so I still don’t get why they’re no longer including them.

            • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 minutes ago

              As well as all your points (which I 100% agree with), my other issue with these dongles is simply that they stick out way more. If I buy a pair of headphones with an angled connector, I can plug them in and wrap the wire a little bit and then when the phone’s in my pocket, the wire takes up basically no space and doesn’t get smushed about by my leg.

              With a dongle, I need an extra couple inches of vertical space, and because the wire/connectors are sticking directly out the phone, they get bent all over the place. Absolutely crap design. Yes 90 degree USB-C to headphone jacks exist but they take up way more space than just a headphone jack.

            • Lazhward@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              You lose them easily

              Just leave them connected to the headphones.

              you can’t charge your phone if they’re connected

              Dongles with an additional usb port exist.

              if you disconnect your headphones the device still behaves as if they’re plugged in.

              Again, leave the dongle connected to the headphones, not the phone.

              It’s so much less convenient

              It is less convenient, but I’d argue not by all that much. More importantly it’s not any less convenient for the vast majority who are already only using Bluetooth.

              there’s just no downside to having a dedicated headphone jack

              1. It’s an additional, and to most people superfluous, point for water ingress. Water damage is the most common type of damage in phones.

              2. It takes up space which could be utilised otherwise, like with a slightly larger battery or larger speakers or camera modules.

              3. It’s an additional part which needs to be manufactured, stocked, installed and purchased. Extra cost which only benefits a few. This is especially important to Fairphone in particular because they don’t use off-the-shelf components and promise to supply replacement parts pretty much indefinitely. I.e. Fairphone would have to design a custom module and then have that module in stock and manufactured specifically for them for the lifetime of each of their devices. That’s not a trivial expense.

              • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                It’s an additional […] point for water ingress.

                the whole back panel is a big point of water ingress when that is not glued shut hard

                It takes up space which could be utilised otherwise, like with a slightly larger battery or larger speakers or camera modules.

                I never needed the additional camera modules, and there were phones with single camera module that made very nice images. the jack is also often at the top of the device where the battery doesn’t reach, but in my phone there’s also enough place for it between the bottom and the battery for a jack connector. in a fairphone

                It’s an additional part which needs to be manufactured, stocked, installed and purchased. Extra cost which only benefits a few.

                exact same opinion about multiple camera modules. nobody really needs them.

              • Asetru@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I can’t have them connected to my headphones all the time because I connect headphones to other devices that all have a fucking headphone jack.

                1. It’s an additional, and to most people superfluous, point for water ingress. Water damage is the most common type of damage in phones.

                I’ve had watertight phones with a headphone jack over a decade ago.

                1. It takes up space which could be utilised otherwise, like with a slightly larger battery or larger speakers or camera modules.

                Yes. Anything you add to a phone is a tradeoff. No shit. These points are what is usually used to justify the lack of a jack. But maybe, just maybe, they don’t save as much money as they make with selling wireless headphones and this is just an excuse? Especially the big companies like Apple or Samsung that sell their own peripherals? And this whole thing is just an excuse to sell overpriced gadgets that need to be replaced every few years because of their batteries? Maybe, just maybe, it’d be valid if consumers still had a choice and could pick phones with or without a jack and would have to pay for the luxury of using decent headphones with a few milliamperehours?

                1. It’s an additional part which needs to be manufactured, stocked, installed and purchased. Extra cost which only benefits a few. This is especially important to Fairphone in particular because they don’t use off-the-shelf components and promise to supply replacement parts pretty much indefinitely. I.e. Fairphone would have to design a custom module and then have that module in stock and manufactured specifically for them for the lifetime of each of their devices. That’s not a trivial expense.

                Manufacturing a phone is not a trivial expense. Removing features is a business decision and a headphone jack costs money but doesn’t earn any whereas they can produce more cheaply without one. I get it. It’s just that doing so requires you to buy and use battery powered headphones that are much less sustainable than traditional magnets tied to a cable. How a company that lives off its promise to safe the world jumps on that wagon is a miracle to me. Companies that remove headphones don’t care about audio quality (which is why Sony still produces phones with audio jacks, I guess) or sustainability. Which is odd for a company like fp.

                • Lazhward@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  requires you to buy and use battery powered headphones

                  This is simply false though, we’d agreed that you are required to buy and use a dongle, and that this is an added inconvenience. But you are not required to switch to wireless headphones and your old cans haven’t suddenly become useless. People still have a choice between wired and wireless, wired has just become a little less convenient, that’s all. I completely agree with you that people shouldn’t go out buying new gadgets if their old stuff is still functional, but you can just continue using your old headphones if you get a new phone if you buy a dongle with it. Inconvenient yes, but not the end for wired headphones.

          • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yup. If anything, they should add a second USB-C connector. Much more versatile and you can still charge your phone if one of them dies.

            These flaky, but simultaneously bulky headphone connectors need to die. They’re inferior in pretty much every way imaginable.

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I just have a dap that can receive bluetooth. More battery life, drives literally anything to very loud, 4.4mm out and can hold it’s own music library and play it without eating phones battery or memory.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I use mine. Bluetooth is great and all, but it’s still not the same quality as a hard-line. And they also run out of batteries.

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I used mine all the time because I hate using bluetooth even though I have expensive bluetooth headphones, I have now cancelled you out

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        My decent Bluetooth headphones have the option to plug in a headphone cable to use them wired. I use it occasionally so I can reduce audio latency, which can be useful with gaming…and essential with rhythm games.