I mean the section you list ‘reception’ lists some vagueries about how it’s been recieved (positively and negatively) in various countries but it’s certainly not shouting out that it’s unreliable.
Likewise the controversies section below has three relatively minor events over its entire history.
Err, has something changed or isn’t Radio Free Asia still a somewhat questionable source?
Yes but our admins and mods trusted source says it’s good so it stays 😭
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/radio-free-asia/
I mean the section you list ‘reception’ lists some vagueries about how it’s been recieved (positively and negatively) in various countries but it’s certainly not shouting out that it’s unreliable.
Likewise the controversies section below has three relatively minor events over its entire history.
Hardly seems like a smoking gun…