You need more meaningful things going on in your life.

🚑🚑🚑

Gas stoves heat things faster and hotter, I’m fine with a slight trade off for those features.

the breading suuuuuuuucccccckkksssss

If I had the time to make a sandwich I wouldn’t be ordering one at McDonalds.

I don’t know where you live. I live in a big city. I’ve never had a McDonalds / Burger King sandwich where the iceberg wasn’t fresh.

more nutritional

Lol, Iceberg lettuce under the most optimal condition is very nutrient poor, I don’t know making it myself would make any practical difference.

Taste is subjective, what tastes “better” to you might not be what tastes “better” to me.

I for one prefer the taste and crunch of shredded Iceberg over any other lettuce in a burger.

They don’t taste the same

My M2 air is silent because it has no fans. I’ve never had any trouble doing any office / photoshop / illustrator work. Battery life lasts hours and hours and hours.

It’s not all marketing, there’s substance too

Sometimes carbon credits are sold off trees that weren’t going to be cut down anyway 😂😂

Wendover has a really great video on carbon offsetting on YouTube and nebula

When you said 20 years later I genuinely thought you meant like early 90s

On a related note my Brother 2270DW has been working flawlessly since 2012. It survived two moves just fine. Toners are cheap and widely available

I have it hooked up to my wifi and any new pc or mac connected to the wifi can print effortlessly

He’s a man of finer taste with an extensive collection of fedoras

So why don’t they split YouTube and YouTube music subs? It can save people like us money

I want ad free YouTube but don’t want YouTube music. I don’t want to pay for extra shit that I won’t be using.

I use Spotify way more than I use YouTube. Spotify does one thing and it does it extremely well.

If Spotify added unlimited free Uber eats delivery tomorrow and bumped up the price to $20 a month, then sure, it’d be a good deal but I wouldn’t want any of that.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Feeding the starving is mutually exclusive especially when you can subsidize farmers. Farmers make a terrible wage it wouldn’t even be expensive to pay them off for free grain, cattle etc…

This is starting to feel like a troll because no one can be this dense or uninformed.

Farms and crops are heavily subsidized. The reason farmers are in a bind is not because of subsidies, it’s because of conglomerates and predatory business practices by them.

I won’t even reply to the second paragraph because it’s a word soup written by AI.

Please, for the love of god, do a bit of reading, learn logic and fallacies before coming into public forums to debate.

No one wants a rocket program.

This is why I mentioned the importance of funding education earlier. You have tunnel vision because you either didn’t attend school, didn’t pay attention while there or simply had a very poor curriculum.

Feeding the starving and doing everything else aren’t mutually exclusive. The reason why we aren’t feeding the hungry is not because we are launching rockets into space.

Space programs and NASA has contributed a lot of technologies that we use in our everyday life. It made our lives easier, safer and has opened up more economic opportunities. If you are generating more money, more jobs, more services then it’s easier to have extra money for social services.

$2,000,000,000 to Elon this past year

At this point it feels like you have comprehension issues, because me and several other people have already explained to you in detail that NASA isn’t donating money to Elon.

Alright, you dumbass, I will entertain.

SpaceX sells a service that NASA buys. It’s cheaper and easier for NASA to contract out space launches & the R&D associated with it to other companies. It’s common for other government agencies to contract out to private companies for goods and services. SpaceX isn’t the only space company that receives contracts from NASA either. NASA is always looking to hedge their bet to not be too dependent on a single company.

Like any other company, SpaceX uses the profit from their business + investors to fund new ventures like Starlink. No matter what you think of Musk, Starlink has had a positive impact for a lot of people in rural areas. Starlink is faster, more reliable and costs less than traditional satellite internet. Even if this cost tax dollars, it would be dollars well spent as we’re connecting more of the country to high speed internet. This has direct social, educational and economical impact.

If you want NASA to stop hiring SpaceX for launches then it’ll hurt NASA too. They will have to spend a lot more money to R&D, test, build and maintain a new rocket program.

Whoever is funding NASA should devote more funding to education - the need is clearly evident from your comments.

I discover the crashed F35 in my lone walk in the woods. As I start to take it apart for parts, a woman catches me. She tells me to stop. It’s her father’s business. She’s Lockheed. I say no. We make love all night. In the morning, the feds come and I escape in one of their uniforms. I tell her to meet me in Mexico, but I go to Canada. I don’t trust her. Besides, I like the cold. Thirty years later, I get a postcard. I have a son and he’s the chief of FBI. This is where the story gets interesting. I tell Lockheed to meet me in Paris by the Trocadero. She’s been waiting for me all these years. She’s never taken another lover. I don’t care, I don’t show up. I go to Berlin. That’s where I stashed the F35