I mean all “carbon neutral” means is they planted a few trees to offset it. Good, but not great
I mean all “carbon neutral” means is they planted a few trees to offset it. Good, but not great
Who would win. A cyberpunk looking “$30k” robotaxi or one speed bump/pot hole
Ah but the capitalist has to sacrifice the short term and play the long game of not over harvesting. And nothing matters more to a capitalist than short term profit
Sir this is a technology community
Wow thanks Jon. I’d just finished making a lasagne and now it’s disappeared. Kids are crying, nice one
This has nothing to do with the article it’s self, but I absolutly hate GIFs as the thumbnail. I get that they do it for the attention, but if every site starts doing this, my feed will look awful.
CRANK YOUR HOGS, BROTHER
So when’s the ruling against OpenAI and the like using the same copyrighted material to train their models
Phew, for a minute there I thought no one was profiting from this
As a !fuckcars@lemmy.world subscriber, I’m deeply conflicted by all this
The ultimate solution to sea level rise due to climate change
I think that’s pretty much impossible to achieve. One persons far-right content, is another’s “common sense”
I imagine Wetherspoons in the UK are doing a huge job keeping the average that low
I now have more questions
If their store was good I think more people would be ok buying via Alexa. But even searching on the web or app, the top result is hardly ever the correct thing I searched for
Wasn’t this just voice recognition for orders? We’ve been doing this for years without it being called AI, but I guess now the marketing people are in charge
It only says “cheaper” not “cheap”
Can only hope that as sites continue further down the enshitification road, more users question it and find the fediverse.
I only learnt about it due to Reddits API changes causing Apollo to stop working.
Hey give some credit to America’s other enemies: China, North Korea, and Iran
Sounds like it was Big Ambitions