I’m sure you’ve never suggested people doing something might be better off spending their time doing something else, but most people have.
I’m sure you’ve never suggested people doing something might be better off spending their time doing something else, but most people have.
I’m flattered! I’m not single, but maybe my wife could be talked into stuff…
Like I said, using those blocks to build with would emit far less CO2 than the equivalent amount of concrete. You can keep pretending you answered a yes or no question, but you did not.
And it’s because you are either supremely ignorant or know for a fact that art is vital to most people on this planet, literally going back to the origins of our species, and that it has absolutely nothing to do with oil, so defacing it will not stop fossil fuel production, and are just refusing to admit it.
Maybe you would like to live in a world that is both fossil fuel and art free. Most people would not want to live in a world where the latter is the reality.
That is not the question I asked. You are still evading. It’s not a gotcha. You said art doesn’t matter because of climate change. I am giving you two examples of art that can be turned into something functional (at a lower carbon output than cement or concrete, I might add) and you refuse to say whether or not they should be. Answer the question.
You’re evading the question.
So you agree that those should be used for building material, yes?
It’s endlessly recycled.
Got it. Cut up the Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial into usable stone for building material.
While we’re at it, let’s also do it to the Holocaust memorial in Berlin. That’s a lot of useful stone blocks.
No art on a dead planet, am I right?
My options would be either “I told you I was sick” or “You think you’ve got problems?”
Whatever. You can’t plant explosives on holograms!
Jet fuel can’t melt light beams!
May I suggest food waste from someone’s garbage can? I hear that works.
I brought up Karen Silkwood and Erin Brockovich elsewhere. They were not put in cages. They were just willing to do some very hard work rather than just stunts.
(The store was just out of helium.)
I’m sure some Germans wish they could claim Mozart, the Strausses and even Hedy Lamarr as their own, but they were not and they never will be.
I’m sure Austria would be willing to give Germany Falco, however.
Seems more like a gender reveal party sort of thing.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/23/us/gender-reveal-explosion-new-hampshire-trnd/index.html
What do you think this is, a La Quinta?
I always forget that Lemmy is about everyone being very serious all the time.
I’m afraid it’s already in use by politicians.
There is a massive, massive gulf between “never try anything” and “throw soup at paintings in the hopes of making people aware of a problem they’re already aware of and not just get pissed off at you.”
Do paintings in a museum offset the oil industry? Because that’s what they’re throwing soup at.
Does throwing soup at paintings stop the oil industry? Has it made a single dent in their massive profits?