ha, gotem
ha, gotem
Maybe look up atheism then try correcting your own comment instead of theirs :)
In all seriousness, I think your definitions are a few centuries out of date. It’s been drifting toward meaning a-gnostic instead of undecided. Contemporarily, it’s used to explain one’s believed level of knowledge on a claim. I can, for instance, be agnostic toward plate tectonics, and be made gnostic of them by evidence.
“Why! Do users! Dislike! The use! Of emojis! On Lemmy!?”
Overused, they’re just so tiring too read. I think, if you’re gonna go that hard, just full send hieroglyphics and drop the text aspect.
Well, it was a run-on thought! It really does feel that convoluted when you try and figure it out, but rest assured, you’ve now thought about this in more depth than most conservatives!
Oh goodness, I should hope not! I love arguing on the internet, and I would hate to think that I’m actually changing peoples minds.
“Knowingly” my partner in Christ I thought you were having a stroke. Fucking rape man? What the fuck is wrong with you.
Are you okay? Wrong community, maybe?
“Hotlinking from this site has been disabled” Damn that hits deep
Oh, thank the gods- it’s back! Check the image, everyone! Jupiter’s back!
“walk the bird” has cursed crossover potential with my understanding of British slang
That minors can’t consent to anything, even when supported by a consenting guardian, is pretty extreme, but I kinda agree with most of what you say here.
What a “damn kids these days” quote
Yeah, well. World is full of racists. Can hardly even make fun of 'em without being mistaken for one, now.
This reminded me of the month ‘wigga’ was every fucking one’s favorite word at my very-nearly-all-white school. Nothing good, indeed.
Ah, heck. I thought it was a witch’s curse. You’re telling me time fried this rice?
Are you aware of medicine? It’s pretty rude to say “im not disabled like you. It’d be wrong for you to not suffer,” as you did.
Now THIS is podracing
b e a n s tbh
IF you define taking and shrinking a corpse’s. head as a violation of the rights of that corpse’s human rights, then yes. Of course, I disagree with most of what you asserted. I guess my first two questions are “Why does a corpse get rights?” and really just… generally… with the moral system thing. If one feels “the environment” is more important than a human, then they should be pro-kill-all-humans?? I’m not sure that tracks. Most societies have a moral system that’s a little more complicated than “destroy everything that’s not the most morally significant to protect it from being hurt by less moral things.”
Anyway, interesting question! Maybe we should talk about corpse rights as a new category of rights? Less important, perhaps, than living humans, but more important than nothing?
“Hey everyone, 198-fucking-4 here. Unlike some other people, I don’t feel the need to tell others about myself. No, my opinions are my own and I’m keeping them to myself. The fewer people read this, in fact, the better!”
I think it’s really pretty color inverted! Luckily, I’m not having trouble reading it, either- my eyes thank you.