![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
1·
1 year agoWell in these cases, I just scrolled past. It wasn’t a common enough occurence for me.
Well in these cases, I just scrolled past. It wasn’t a common enough occurence for me.
Ironically, that was one of the feature I actually really liked. Seeing the same post two or three times didn’t really matter to me since if it was posted in different communities, there was a wider variety of responses and perspectives (or I could just scroll past it).
Also it let me discover new communities that I wasn’t aware existed.
The issue with LLMs that I have is that while they are great at certain tasks, they are bad at anything, let’s call it factual, due to their nature.
I can for example use it to quickly draft up a email or a piece of python code, and I can immediately see whether or not the response it generated is actually what I want.
If I go ask it what the hottest day in a given country was or ask it to explain something, I have absolutely no idea whether it’s bullshit or not and I will have to double check it anways.
I think the learning curve with LLMs as a tool is to be able to know when to use it and when to rely on other sources instead.