That was the headline of my review of the Barbie movie.
That was the headline of my review of the Barbie movie.
Yeah, but just like the Change My Mind one, there’s memes for the same thing without the toxic person. For example this:
That’s an interesting username… Are you Jake from a farm or are you a farm that grows Jake?
Cheap IKEA rugs are actually named after Danish places.
They are? Examples, please! I wanna know if it’s any of the places here that deserve it! 😁
“Skittles mini garbage house kit”
Implying that M&Ms are garbage Skittles, I guess? 🤷
It sounds like a Victorian gentleman being coy about a genital wart:
“I shan’t be going out this eve, old chap. I’m afraid I’ve got an estus on my pirkle.”
If Footmen Tire You, What Will Horses Do?
I hear that one guy died…
reverend Estus T. Pirkle. Why? I have no idea. He’s not especially charismatic and he sounds like an idiot.
Hell, even his NAME is goddamn atrocious to the point that it’s impossible to take him seriously 😂
Don’t you mean CUMsplayers?
Ok, that’s it. The stupidest thing I’ve written all year and still clicked post. There was stiff competition, pun intended, but this is the winner.
Error! Recursion loop! Danger, Will Fuckheadson!
Cross posted this to !pissposting@lemmy.world where it belongs. You dumb fucks.
It’s America’s Finest News Source!
The Onion’s parent company, Global Tetrahedron
Eee! They named the parent company after the evil corporation parent company in The Onion Movie! That makes me unreasonably happy! 😂🥰
Restating the original point as a rebuttal to a comment agreeing with it is an interesting choice 🤔
Laughing at someone is hostile
As I made clear in another comment, that part was a joke. As in I didn’t mean it. I don’t endorse body shaming, even if someone’s a selfish lover lol
Parting ways amicably is much better.
Yeah, obviously.
I also think that men should not be pressed to do things they don’t want to do in bed
Nobody’s suggesting that. Can we do this without the strawmen, please?
Also, not every woman enjoys the same methods, so teaching a man something might not work for his next partner.
Sure, but some things work for more than one person. Such as being open to suggestions of how to improve. Which needs to be a two-way street and voluntary, of course.
People have different tastes in sexual stuff.
You don’t say?
It’s necessary to communicate and be prepared that there can be different preferences
Of course. That’s what I’m advocating for.
It’s ok if someone doesn’t want to do some stuff in bed.
Again, I never said to force anyone to do anything. I meant something along the lines of “X isn’t really working for me, could you try Y?” or “I really like X, is that something you’re into?”, NOT “do X or get out!”
I’d argue that people are not obligated to learn
I mean technically being selfish isn’t illegal… Still better for everyone if they aren’t, though 🤷
If they don’t want to learn what you need to be happy with them, leave them.
Except for the fact that the next one along is gonna get bad sex too. A lover is like a public park: when you’re done using it, the polite thing is to leave it as good or better than when you arrived.
Don’t push them to do something they don’t want to do.
Unlike the OP, I’m advocating for constructive criticism and pointers. That’s not pushing. That’s nudging at most.
There’s no reason to be hostile about it.
If you think giving helpful advice on how you can better please someone in bed, in stead of pretending that they’re already a champion, is hostile behavior, that’s a YOU problem…
Yeah, there was a distinct danger of being too wholesome and helpful for a shitpost community for sure! 😄
Only thing Folger’s is good for is providing a receptacle for the friend you’re about to wear all over your shades, beard, and hair because everything’s a fucking travesty with Walter.