assa123

deleted by creator

Hey, no need to be sarcastic! /s

By which author? I can’t find the book

I love Darknet Diaries. I want to recommend one in the same genre, Modem Mischief.

I would go even further and say that we should have it until we can be sure it will respect others’ rights. All kind of rights, not only Copyright. Unlike Bing at the beginning, with all it’s bullying and menaces, or Chatgpt regurgitating private information gathered from God knows where.

The problem with waiting is the arms race with other governments. I feel it’s similar to fossil fuels, but all governments need to take the risk of being disadvantaged. Damned prisoner’s dilemma.

Isn’t that exactly what roofuskit said? Sorry to ask but, where’s the lie?

deleted by creator

and that’s why it should be illegal, the big “buy” button ahould have higher precedence over any “renting” claims in the ToS and any attempt of misrepresentation should be fined.

stack overflow has a lot of R knowledge, in questions already asked and in an active community. Try looking if your question has been asked there before, and if not, ask it. Many beginner questions are not about a particular language but about logic and math, maybe you can give a look at math.stackexchange also. For more simple questions, language models are very good (Chatgpt/bing, Bard)

I hope that’s the case here. The sad thing is that not having the rights to something doesn’t stops you from filling a claim, even scammers fill DMCA claims over original content, the movie is already down from archive.

Not all interested buyers are in the ad business, and governments can make payments in a way that is difficult to audit from a third party perspective, definitely not in any currency or a change in the balance sheet. I wish things where different but seems to me that paying won’t protect me from them harvesting every bit they can.

Indeed very interesting. It is a fundamental principle of finance: Investors seek to maximize utility, but this is under the axiom of complete rationality. And even if that condition is met (which I doubt), the utility function of money is not concave at all levels, for example leftmost of the graph, before the price of food. I think that after some point, utility becomes flat and Musk is way beyond that point. Additionally he seems to be a risk loving investor, not a risk averse.

Thank you vm! NetGuard is awesome. I will test Shelter.

How do you do that?

I think it can be solved with a two step process. First, the mods of the community and only them can make a request to move from instance A to instance B, and second, the admins or mods of instance B approve the request, importing only the posts and comments from federated users.

Yes, I had read that, hence the “I was”. Anyway, the wayback machine is still worth a try since it can go back pretty far back in time (if you are ever in that situation again, that is).

It’s infuriating, and even more when you start looking for that profit pattern in companies that range from “philanthropic” foundations leeching from volunteers while buying their own companies stock, to academic journals with CEO’s earning ridiculous amounts of money over research that someone else paid.

I was under the assumption that it was removed bc of the migration/protests. Would that be the case, I wouldn’t mind the info being lost. I’ve been trying to avoid clicking on (live) reddit links even if there’s the answer I’m looking for. Also, maybe using the wayback machine does the trick?