Bill Burr had a bit on it.
Bill Burr had a bit on it.
Putting them all together seems like a double-edged sword, no?
Might as well just vote for Literally Anybody Else
A PhD can get a much higher paying (and likely less physically difficult) job than fast food.
That maybe be true, but they may be trying a different career, or unable to find a job in their field because of oversaturation, or whatever other reason.
The unspoken assumption when someone is “overqualified” is that they will take a better job if the opportunity presents itself.
Isn’t that everybody though? If a cashier in fastfood got an opportunity to become a highly-paid streamer, they’d quit their fastfood job immediately too. But I do get your point: better credentials mean better job chances, mean greater likelihood of moving a job that’s paid better.
That’s an assumption. Maybe they want to switch careers.
What does that have to do with qualifications? If a PhD applies for a job at a fastfood joint and asks for the same wage as everybody else, that has nothing to do with qualifications.
Can’t wait for World War 4 because some white nazi woman wins an election. It will shut up the feminists who believe women are better than men. Women are just as human and just as shit.
What the equivalent opposite of fewer?
What are your work hours like? And have you invested in anything? (stock, crypto, physical assets like gold or silver, …)
What a state the world is in. We consider you lucky, yet this should be the absolute minimum.
Birds chirping
Just wait until it starts taking stuff from 4chan, twitch, and twitter. Things are going to be come so much more interesting.
The French word for “entertainment” is “divertissement” and you don’t need to know French to get what it is: a diversion from things that matter.
Do you shit with the door open in public toilets? You have nothing to hide after all and don’t require privacy there.
Saving accounts are just a great resource for banks. Their returns are always less than inflation so you’re basically always losing money with them.
One law can not cover all situations
Not all, but most. The goal isn’t “banning guns”, it’s regulating them more strictly. If you want to get a gun, you should be mentally sound, know how to maintain it, secure it, and shoot it safely. It’s the same with cars in many places on this planet: you need to go through about 60-100 hours of training, prove you’re able to handle it, and know the theory around it. You can’t just show up to a car show, buy a car and ride off with it without a license.
Whether you want to protect yourself from bear, shoot at birds on your farm, feel safe in your home in the middle of the city, or collect guns to never shoot them, you still must have a license to own it.
Because content distributors haven’t thought of another way to get money. The only other thing they came up with is subscriptions. Some have thought of donations, but they haven’t banded together to come up with an alternative. It’s weak and totally mid.
Always felt like stabbing footballs when practicing juggling. Knowing I felt that kind of anger towards inanimate objects was a big reason not to have kids. Destroying your own property is fine. It’s just property. A kid though…