I remember that scene lol. I was like, no way! How?!
- 0 Posts
- 39 Comments
Missing pixels?
It should be noted that they are in the process of being replaced.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Microsoft is is bed with Google now, in a worse, more OS-integrated way than Mozilla was [in bed with Google]. This timeline sucks.English3·15 hours agoOh sure, that makes sense. I never use Edge except when I’m testing a windows server VM.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsAppEnglish1·15 hours agoI am so excited to see people embracing xmpp! I’ve been using it since 2010 and I was really bummed when my company got swallowed up by a huge conglomerate and we were forced to use their shitty proprietary one.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Just lost internship at general electric1·1 day agoShe is a total nutcase. Jamie Loftus interviewed her on Sixteenth Minute.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Microsoft is is bed with Google now, in a worse, more OS-integrated way than Mozilla was [in bed with Google]. This timeline sucks.English141·1 day agoI don’t really understand the issue here. Why does anyone care if you can sign into Google services on Edge?
A rorist attack, thank you very much.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsAppEnglish3·1 day agoInteresting phrasing. How so?
I’ll spell it out for you so you can join in on enjoying why your comment was particularly hilarious. You created the very narrow spectrum this post was made to ridicule: from far right (“conservative”) to right wing (“liberal”). You never even considered that it is only right wing to refuse to provide housing for people!
By your logic, anyone from Australia would say the literal exact opposite. Let’s not forget what Liberal parties around the world are like.
That being said, in the US there are no elected center left candidates except maybe two or three. Elected Democrats—liberals, usually—are just as traitor lunatic as right wingers when it comes to anti homeless designs.
The fact that you talk about “the other extreme” without even a hint of self reflection is troublesome at best. The other “extreme” is called housing, son.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockersEnglish1·5 days agoNo shit. The question is just about the current system. Your answer is like saying “How should we implement universal healthcare while capitalism still exists?” “Pass”. It doesn’t make sense.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockersEnglish1·5 days agoThanks for your thoughtful response!
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockersEnglish1·5 days agoThat’s how much my student subscription is, that’s why I was curious. I think it’s $6.99 plus tax?
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockersEnglish1·5 days agoThat’s really interesting! Would you pay $8 for a no ads subscription?
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockersEnglish1·5 days agoPass on what? Using YouTube at all?
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockersEnglish1·5 days agoAll decent people would. I meant within the bounds of treason and tyranny.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockersEnglish1·5 days agoInteresting. I didn’t think anyone was cool with any ads.
buttnugget@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockersEnglish42·5 days agoI’m curious what people would prefer for revenue generation models. Just subscription fees? A lot of folks also seem resistant to that as well.
Ohhhhhh ok I think I kinda see that, thanks!