• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • carbotect@vlemmy.nettoFediverse@lemmy.worldWhat should we do about Threads?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am pro-fediverse, so I guess making Mastodon atleast as easy to use as Threads is a must.

    If you look at statistics, Mastodon always gains a massive amount of users, when Twitter does something stupid. Most of these also return back to Twitter, the moment they realize, that Mastodon has no VIPs.

    If Threads integrates well with ActivityPub, then people on Mastodon will be more likely to stay, because Threads gives fediverse users access to the VIPs, that they used Twitter for in the first place. This stops people from leaving Mastodon in the short term.

    In the long term Mastodon needs to advertise itself to younger people, because nowadays this is the only way for new social media platforms to establish themselves.

    That’s how TikTok, SnapChat and Instagram became popular. This would make Mastodon fresh, while Twitter would transform into a graveyard like facebook.

    Also having more tech companies, media orgs, cultural orgs, universities and maybe even governments host their instances, would make the federated aspect stronger and the whole fediverse more scalable.


  • carbotect@vlemmy.nettoFediverse@lemmy.worldWhat should we do about Threads?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Threads is a Twitter competitor. Same applies to Mastodon.

    Twitter is only useful because companies, celebrities amd politicians embrace it. Nobody cares about ordinary Twitter users. Twitter is a platform for networking with people in the industry and announcing stuff to customers.

    Mastodon right now is not an alternative to Twitter, because there is practically nobody important there.

    Threads has better chances to overcome this and has already in a few hours pulled more VIPs onto their platform, than Mastodon in multiple years.





  • carbotect@vlemmy.nettoFediverse@lemmy.worldWhat should we do about Threads?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    As the fediverse grows, there will inevitably be more centralized instances. Every big tech corp may want to start their own instance, similar to how most tech corps provide their own mail services.

    There are millions of email service providers, but Gmail and Outlook are synonymous to email for a large amount of people.

    Defederating with Meta and Tumblr is like Protonmail blocking every mail from Gmail. You just cripple yourself and make your instance useless.



  • American drivers licenses are basically just EU style ID cards. For new licenses you even need biometric data. State IDs and the “Passport Card” are (somewhat obscure) alternatives.

    Europeans only need to apply for ID cards at around the age, were the average American gets their driver’s license.

    A young American adult is probably almost just as identifiable by their government, as a young European adult would be by theirs.

    Seeing regulations like the REAL ID act, I would say that America is headed towards more identification, rather than less.





  • Maybe you could try to convince through other features, like sending sharper images, videos, audio messages or video calling etc.

    If you get closer with her friend circle (or if she gets closer to your friend circle), you could propose to make a group chat, where you can keep each other up to date or plan future activities together. Your wife will probably not want to miss out on that.

    Don’t talk about encryption or security to normal people, who are not into tech. They do not care. Only talk about features, that they can actually use, and only in situations were this would be useful. Don’t be preachy about your messenger use, don’t make them feel stupid.




  • I don’t get it. Are Google employees completely ignoring all the negative press their messaging apps get?

    Everyone online agrees, that all these messaging apps that Google keeps pumping, just hurt each other.

    Here is a list of every messaging app that Google has ever produced:

    Android SMS
    
    Bump!
    
    Cloud to Device Messaging
    
    Chat (not the same as Google Chat)
    
    Disco
    
    Dodgeball
    
    Firebase Cloud Messaging
    
    Gizmo5
    
    Gmail
    
    GTalkService
    
    Google+
    
    Google+ Hangouts (not the same as Google Hangouts)
    
    Google+ Messenger
    
    Google.com/talk
    
    Google Allo
    
    Google Assistant (it really did once have its own text feature)
    
    Google Assistant Messages (and then this but only in a family group)
    
    Google Buzz
    
    Google Chat
    
    Google Cloud Messaging
    
    Google Docs
    
    Google Docs Editor Chat
    
    Google Duo
    
    Google Fi
    
    Google Friend Connect
    
    Google Groups
    
    Google Hangouts
    
    Google Hangouts Chat
    
    Google Hangouts Meet
    
    Google Helpouts
    
    Google Huddle
    
    Google Latitude
    
    Google Maps Messages
    
    Google Meet
    
    Google Messenger SMS
    
    Google Pay Messages
    
    Google Phone Messaging
    
    Google Photos Messages
    
    Google Schemer
    
    Google Spaces (this was basically Google's version of Instagram and it lasted less than a year)
    
    Google Stadia Messages
    
    Google Talk
    
    Google Voice
    
    Google Voice Legacy
    
    Google Voice Third-party Apps
    
    Google Voice for G Suite
    
    Google Voice FXO VoIP Gateway (Obihai)
    
    Google Wave
    
    GrandCentral Communications
    
    Jaiku
    
    Jibe Mobile
    
    Meebo
    
    Messages
    
    Orkut
    
    Postini
    
    Slide
    
    Sparrow
    
    YouTube Messages