Because branding exists.
On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a human.
Because branding exists.
Do they just, make the money disappear if you don’t reach the 50 or do they add up till you reach 50?
Oh I assure you Timmy once you grow up you’ll appreciate friction ;) ;)
Maybe I went to bad schools, maybe my country has a dysfunctional education system, but I suspect the matter is widespread because it’s way easier to teach factual information rather than dive into the nuances of how confident we are about our explanations.
Some reductive examples: Pluto is / is not a planet, wings work because the path air takes is longer than on the other side, the cause for this war was xyz, you can’t subtract below 0 (that’s at a very early age of course), this philosopher thought X.
Oh I guess a CRUCIAL one is how most teachers are horribly unfit to answer “Why should I care about this?”, but that’s beside the point, in a way.
You broke nothing, it just annoys me that if you don’t hit university they refuse to teach you the unconfortable truth on plenty of things and you come out of school with a biased idea that everything has been explained already (history, math, physics…).
So the generic “particles just rubs” in the texbooks were lies and they didn’t know shit?
What the fuck is going on in here?
Proto phone that sends only short strings of text.
Death being the most boring shit I can possibly imagine is pretty high on the list.
2 years ago this investigation into its working was released (abusive working conditions), I think it may be relevant…
It is not the only point when it comes to adopting technologies, when it comes to maximizing privacy, yes maximizing privacy is tautologically the only point.
Because it makes the point for a more solid technology as far as privacy is concerned?
Removed by mod
I can confirm he does that. He’s also been known for his weird obsession for ketchup.
They way I uderstand your comment, LTT is big enought so as to negotiate contracts with sponsor without being forced to share the metric related to the performance of the sponsored segment.
I doubt that’s true for many creators.
I’m pretty sure it does, they do see how many people play the segment.
I enjoyed Carto and Paradise Killer, as far as “different and creative” goes.
Imagine your biggest realization as an adult being a wrong opinion.
So, there’s more than one answer. When it came out the idea was, and it’s debatable how much Nintendo used this concept as a marketing tool or with a design in their head, tha the controller allowed flexibility. For different games, different sections or different preferences, you could hold the two outer handles, and get a basic SNES type thing, or you could hold the mid and either one of the sides.
I feel part of it was a bit of mistrust, maybe from some early testing or internal, about the accuracy or the familiarity of users with the joystick, the design allows people to opt into it or go for the tradizional buttons.
I recall some weird stuff was supposed to be meant for the full left side combo, so directional buttons + analog stick. That was a bit of a far reach…
So beside all the intentions, 99% of the games were played with your left hand on the middle handle and the right hand on the righ handle. Consider there’s a very comfy trigger button below the middle handle that is mirrored or mirrors the left shoulder button.
I think revenues also shifted from selling music to using cheap music to sell concerts.