It’s a self hosted DNS that you can easily run on a raspberry pi

I’m fairly certain Tor is better than a new laptop.

Also, there is no way to actually measure this tight of a tolerance on large parts such as a car, since the standard methods for this tight of a tolerance measurement is… using a caliper, as using automated optical inspection for every dimension isn’t really feasible.

We definitely have lasers that can measure this tolereance.

Scientist: Askes question to magic conch about cancer.

Conch: “Trying shoving bees up your ass.”

Scientists: 😡

Any tool I’m going to use more than once.

!SuspiciouslySpecific@lemmy.world

Please get a second opinion. Im not a Lemmy expert, but I have seen the different apps providing some vastly different setting for NSFW content.

Unless Lemmy has backend code marking all posts NSFW, but I think that would show for you.

This is most likely dependent on what app you are using to view Lemmy. So the short answer is always mark it if you want to be sure.

Your hands are gonna be on fire after those scratches

Are you using an app that could block it?

Your instances is sensoring cuss words.

It’s really nice that Lemmy let’s you edit title.

I’ve never called someone a pussy because I liked them. Lol

Not saying I disagree lol

Looks great to me 🤷

@colonial@lemmy.world

Just like Facebook isn’t in any one state… You could fine the instance owner… Eventually leading to a warrant for non compliance and failure to pay which means you are bared from entering the state of you don’t want to be arrested.

Also they can ban your ip. So no one in the state would see or interact with that instance.

3 things.

1. Is there a minimum number of users for this to be effective? If so, just keeping you instance under that amou t should work.

2. Can they really charge someone who is not running the instance for profit? The article states that the social media owner must take “commercially reasonable” action to verify users. Technically, nothing is commercially reasonable if you aren’t running a Comercial business right?

3. Related to 2. The article says “social media companies”. Most instances aren’t being ran by companies… So again this may be an out for those running instances.

3 things.

1. Is there a minimum number of users for this to be effective? If so, just keeping you instance under that amou t should work.

2. Can they really charge someone who is not running the instance for profit? The article states that the social media owner must take “commercially reasonable” action to verify users. Technically, nothing is commercially reasonable if you aren’t running a Comercial business right?

3… Related to 2. The article says “social media companies”. Most instances aren’t being ran by companies… So again this may be an out for those running instances.