All the NMS comparisons that I’ve heard are also making me want to play it again too, lol
i’m secretly @admin; sshhhhh
i’m also eleanorOpossum@beehaw.org
All the NMS comparisons that I’ve heard are also making me want to play it again too, lol
In the case of Brave and Vivaldi, they add their own undesirable parts (Brave adds crypto bullshit and Vivaldi is closed-source, so $DEITY knows what they’re adding).
Librewolf is open and doesn’t contribute to the Chromium monoculture; so it’s the best option
They do. sorta. It’s definitely possible to put something like Starfield on a dual layer BDROM, probably even uncompressed! But then load times would be fucking crazy because BD is an order of magnitude slower than an SSD.
Distributing install files for a day 1 version of a game and using the disc as an auth key, (which is what they did last gen iirc) is still possible.
The difference between the Fediverse and a closed system like reddit is that it’s open and we’re privy to haphazardly implemented functionality and bad API documentation.
I work on big closed source web apps for a living; they’re just as haphazard and badly documented, it’s just all closed.
I don’t think anyone liked it. More like tolerated it because of a combination of network effects and it being less shitty than Facebook.
At least, that’s why I was on Twitter. People I wanted to follow were there.
You could switch to the ESR branch, which gets feature updates much less frequently.
I disagree. I think it’s mostly a combination of baby duck syndrome and the perceived difficulty of gaming (unless you’re a kid who “needs” to play the flavor of the month over-monetized multiplayer trash)
Why tho? The Venn diagram of people who use Teams and enjoy it enough to use outside of the workplace and PC gamers is two separate circles.
For those who don’t want to read TFA: the brands are Gilead and NYU Lagone Hospital
It’s a combination of Nvidia not supporting mixed refresh rates and mixed DPIs until like really recently and the open source driver not being nearly as performant as the closed one.
I’ve been switching between Arch and Debian for the past 5ish years. I don’t really notice much of a difference, other than Arch has updates much more often than Debian Testing usually does. I like how meta-packages in Arch are more minimal than the ones in Debian, but that’s a very minor thing.
They were, but the porn wasn’t popular until after Fallout 3 and is mostly based on their Fallout 3 and 4 models.
Listing only things that haven’t been listed
I’ve been distrohopping for the decade+ I’ve been using Linux. Keep coming back to Arch. Once I get the initial install done, everything works and I don’t need to touch anything.
The Arch wiki is pretty distro-agnostic (barring package names and pacman
specific stuff). I’ve been distro-hopping for past decade and I’ve always used it as a reference for setting things up.
I used to be really into theming. But now, the default Breeze and Adwaita look good enough that I haven’t bothered wanting to change them in a couple years.
That and thmes always appeared to be some degree of “broken” that I just don’t bother anymore.
I do always change the cursor to the black Adwaita one, even on KDE. It just feels right to me.
When I did still use themes, Numix, Arc Dark, and whatever “flat” themes that I could find were my favorites.