Mine needs 1.3 GB with an itunes library of 160 gb.
Eugenia
Ex-technologist, now an artist. My art: http://www.eugenialoli.com/
- 2 Posts
- 375 Comments
Jellyfin music server. It needs about 1.2 GB of RAM for itself, plus the system.
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.world•The end of Windows 10 is approaching, so it's time to consider Linux and LibreOfficeEnglish3·6 days agoYeah, snaps won’t be able to access the “external” codecs (outside their jail). So either install the official firefox package from the firefox site, or chrome.
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.world•The end of Windows 10 is approaching, so it's time to consider Linux and LibreOfficeEnglish5·6 days agoYou need to install the codecs, there’s a way to do it on ubuntu, just google search it (and there’s an option during installation to do it too). The N150 cpu and its integrated gpu is not a problem for your codec problem, it’s a matter of installing the right software.
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Music Production and Software Synthesizers/VST's under LinuxEnglish1·7 days agodeleted by creator
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Music Production and Software Synthesizers/VST's under LinuxEnglish7·7 days agoThe reality is, to get these Windows VSTs to work on Linux, is possible via 2-3 ways, but they’re crashy, and sometimes will work, and after an OS upgrade might stop working (as it happened last year with yabridge under ubuntu) etc. The truth is, you can’t rely 100% on these VSTs anymore under Linux, it’s too hairy of a situation overtime. You might be able to get it working for a project, and two years later to try to reload that project, only to have these plugins not working anymore, so the project would crash on you and not be able to load it anymore.
If you want to switch to Linux, you will need to use the well supported, native plugins only that get updated regularly for new linux versions. Yes, it’s a waste of money for your existing purchases, but this is what’s true for everyone who have ever bought Windows software in the past, and they’re now switching to Linux. Maybe you can sell them?
Alternatively, use Windows for your audio work, and if you want to stay on Windows 10, make sure that this computer is not on the internet connected anymore (due to not receive security updates anymore), and use Linux for your everyday computer tasks.
Look at QCad. They have a paid ($40), and a free version that is fully functional and open source. It’s the most autocad-like app out there, so learning that has the advantage of learning the UI of autocad too.
LibreCad that others suggested was forked from Qcad about 15 years ago and hasn’t moved much in terms of features. While QCad has. So in my opinion, it’s the best solution.
Then there’s Freecad, but that’s more about 3D cad, and it’s more complicated overall.
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Just wanted to show off the lowest end hardware I ever ran Linux onEnglish1·7 days agoI’m telling you what htop reports.
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Just wanted to show off the lowest end hardware I ever ran Linux onEnglish1·7 days agoTrinity of course. That’s the point of low end computing with Q4OS. :)
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Just wanted to show off the lowest end hardware I ever ran Linux onEnglish4·8 days agoI don’t think the difference between 32bit and 64bit is 2x in memory sizes, it’s way less than that. I run Q4OS, it runs at 350 MBs here.
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Just wanted to show off the lowest end hardware I ever ran Linux onEnglish9·8 days agoAre you using systemd? Because 317 MB of RAM is really low for a normal Debian installation with XFce. At my mom’s 2 GB ram laptop, it uses 850 MB on a cold boot.
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Is it possible to live boot Linux mint with persistence on a usb drive similar to Tails OS?English2·16 days agoThese are the instructions at the mint forum.
Eugenia@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Is it possible to live boot Linux mint with persistence on a usb drive similar to Tails OS?English1·17 days agoYes, I have 2 computers running off of USB with Mint, with persistence. And I’ve set up that for my father in law and a friend too. You boot with one drive, you insert the other one, you UNMOUNT it, and then you load the installer. Please note though, that the bootloader will be installed into the internal drive instead of the usb one. To go around this problem, would be best to disable the internal drive temporarily during installation (either in the bios, or just remove its cable). Then the installer will be forced to write the bootloader on to the usb stick.
I usually set up the partitions as such: 1 GB of fat32 boot partition with the boot flag set, a 4 GB swap partition, and the rest / (root).
Yes, it’s a true install, not a live cd.
You can install Mint on a usb drive, or external ssd. I personally run it on two of my machines where the internal drive died, on a usb stick. These wear out, but hey, for now, it works. So get a second usb, and install it there, or nuke Windows to get it to run well.
I suggest Linux Mint. It has GUIs for almost everything and it’s very stable. With a little bit of tinkering of the services at startup, you can get Mint to run at 700 MB of RAM (as read via htop), instead of its default ~1 GB of RAM. That could be important to fit it better at 4 GB of ram with some demanding browsing.
I disagree with anyone who might suggest Fedora or Ubuntu with 4 GB of RAM. These distros require about 2+ GB of RAM to boot up, double than that of Mint.
Then there are the distros meant for older machines that use less ram, but it’s a shame to use these when your laptop is fast-enough with an 8th gen cpu (comparatively to very old machines, that is). Your CPU scores 3500 points on the passmark cpu benchmark which is enough for any kind of distro. 15 years ago, the average laptop cpu was 600 points (and Linux still runs fine on these with something like Debian/Xfce).
The lowest ram usage I’ve seen with a full-fledge modern distro/DE, is XFce with endeavourOS. I load it at 490 MB of RAM (it takes 630 MB on Mint for the same layout/apps).
Basically, your challenge is the RAM, not the CPU or the drive. Use an appropriate distro for the RAM and the difficulty you want, and always be mindful to not have too many tabs/apps open at the same time.
I think XFce supports quite a few themes for the window manager that completely changes how the window borders look like.
The truth is that none will allow you what you have in your mind exactly, unless you get down dirty and start programming it. However, some DEs are more customizable than others, e.g. KDE is more customizable than Gnome, for example.
Not nearly as low in memory usage. Xubuntu requires 1.1 GB of RAM on a clean boot for example. Lubuntu close to 700 I think.
Your best bet is a secondary M2 slot, there are some laptops that allow for that. You install windows on the first, main ssd. Then you DISABLE that ssd (or you unplug it intenrally), you install linux on the second ssd, and then you enable back the first one. Then you can select using F12 during boot which ssd you want to boot from, by default it’d be windows.
I see you’re from Germany. Well, Tuxedo computers have many laptop models with two ssds in it.