Isn’t it sad that certain negative outcomes can be easily predicted by anyone bothering to think things through, yet no effort ever seems to go to mitigation, only spin and crocodile tears after the fact.
Isn’t it sad that certain negative outcomes can be easily predicted by anyone bothering to think things through, yet no effort ever seems to go to mitigation, only spin and crocodile tears after the fact.
My first thought was “wait, people still think it’s psychosomatic?” Then I read the article and realized that they were not referring to people in general, but to actual doctors!
It never fails to amaze – and annoy! – me how often simple curiosity and wide-ranging reading leaves me better informed than many actual professionals. It’s almost like they got their education and training, then stopped engaging.
Anyway, rant over. I’m glad there are people out there taking things seriously and I hope you continue to meet with success in your treatment.
Interesting. One of the chemicals they reference is tetrachloroethylene. According to this Wikipedia article:
My grandfather had Parkinson’s. I would imagine that he had plenty of exposure in his work as a mechanic from about 1925 on.