The GP is not describing a piezoelectric scale. And you won’t be able to find any piezoelectric scale that is anything similar to “cheap”.

deleted by creator

You want to know if they are protected by something like copyrights?

AFAIK, those two are not, but you’ll get a useful answer if you look at their terms of use.

You can’t copyright a color palette or a design idea, but in principle you can violate trademarks or design patents by copying those two. Again, AFAIK, not the examples you posted, but in general those things could be protected.

Each one in a different way.

So you insist on using some distro where your GPU driver is broken. On the popular one it works just fine.

How’s that a “Linux problem” again?

Anyway, are you forced to use the broken distro? What is it? (If it’s Debian based, it should work just by installing the AMD firmware package. If it doesn’t, it’s because it’s badly maintained.)

So it’s a weird Catch-22, where only experienced users who know where all the menus are will know where the GUI options are, but it’s the new users who need it the most.

Nah. They don’t know it either.

You will use the terminal. And you won’t “level-up” into knowing the GUI. And GUI-focused distros are stupid for adding barriers over the terminal usage.

Avoid installing linux in a partition on the same disk you have windows.

It never works well. Windows will destroy everything within reach.

Yes, they made a huge mess out of it and managed to “measure” the complete opposite of reality.

And yeah, it was based on a paper published on a joke journal at Apr. 1st. The first paragraph of the paper postulates people occupy no volume. (It’s a fun paper, differently from that TV episode.)

The one on the GP’s link is a bit better. Maybe even recognizable.

I wonder what system the OP’s one comes from.

Any new alternative on international settlements is welcome…

But the main BRICS countries have been creating new payment methods for a while now, with a few successes. So, what is he talking about?

Has anybody actually looked at the paper instead of reacting to The Guardian’s reaction?

Because as bad as the Nobel Prize Committee is at their job, that doesn’t look like something you would find in one.

You don’t see the relation between those?

for the less intelligent folks

Yeah, ok.

Global warming doesn’t care if you like the news or not.

Your muscles’ efficiency varies widely on short exercise bursts, and very little on long, constant sessions.

It’s not clear to me what the bike is calibrated to, I’d say it’s correct to set it for long sessions, but I’d expect them to vary widely from one mode to another.

As long as it’s not a water poodle…

He’s publicly accusing Israel of supporting Trump. He didn’t publicly accuse them of anything before that.

There has been a change in what he says.

But yeah, still nothing on what he does.

The US has been pushing a few news on their propaganda machines trying to distance themselves from Israel. I don’t think they’ll go all-in into a war.

The nightmare scenario is it being caused by something even more insidious and omnipresent than microplastics. The second nightmare scenario is microplastics.

Coal mining releases a great deal of methane and other green-house gasses. It’s not clear whether it’s more or less than the LPG entire chain.

A serious paper would compare the entire picture of both. Or at least look at one and refrain from opining about the other.