As much as i dont want russia using our tech for war i dont think a remote kill switch in all tech is a great idea.
As much as i dont want russia using our tech for war i dont think a remote kill switch in all tech is a great idea.
Why downvotes? I think cos everyone is using it and they dont wanna have to confront the idea they fucking themselves.
Dont they also fill all ur food with micro plastics?
So does openai whats ur point?
If there where any more they’d have told us already.
Come use osmand its foss based on open maps data. And if u can contribute by adding map data thats even better.
It doesnt have live traffic or public transport routing unfortunatly tho
Not default but can highly reccommend immich its great.
Probably diet. If u eat a lot of legumes or have very little fibre then that could probably be doing it.
Probably some holdover from when citrus was seen as a high class rich person thing. Or its cheap. Who knows
Good shout.
Its a classic case of simple answer to a complex problem that nobody really thinks about cos it sounds vaguely reasonable in a headline.
This is complete bs.
Tldr: cows in sheds eating corn is the problem, cows eating natural grass actually sequester more carbon than an empty field.
Long answer: Photosynthesis can only get carbon from the atmosphere. This carbon is then turned into plant material in grass. This grass is then eaten by the cow. A small portion of this grass will be converted into methane and other byproducts in the cow’s digestive tracks. Some will be turned to energy for the cow and a vast majority will be shit out as raw unprocessed material. This raw unprocessed material, i.e. cow shit, this will last in the environment sequestering more carbon for longer time than just grass sitting there by itself. A grazed paddock will grow more grass than a non-grazed paddock because the cows are eating the fucking grass. i.e. more carbon from the environment is getting sequestered in the grass and the cow shit.
The only reason that cows get such a bad wrap is that variouse other factors are being counted that really shouldnt be under cows. Deforestation to grow plants to feed livestock, the transportation of meat, livestock feed etc etc.
A properly managed grass fed beef (like what we have here in australia) actually has a net negative effect on ghg. The factory farmed beef eating corn in a shed thats never seen a blade of grass is whats actually causing the ghg seen in the reports.
We have already seen this narrarive been used to strongarm small farmers grazing cattle while the multinational farms get away with fucking the environment cos they can afford the cost of beurocracy.
We are all just 3 warm meals away from anarchy thats something we should do well to remember.
Ps. Its not “cow flatulence” its “enteric fermentation” (burps) cow farts just makes a better headline.
Edit: formatting
I just type hint all my functions and that solves 99% of my type related issues.
Yeah they have nuclear fuel reprocessing
Lemmy Peertube - the linux experiment is all i got so far but more content would b great. Also tubular integration is sick Matrix Mastodon
Havnt tried the rest but open to beibg convinced
Classic windows L. Come to the light side come to the linux master race.
Building a nuke is pretty easy. Just put 2 spheres of plutonium or enriched uranium at either end of a tube add a regular bomb on each end and duct tape it to the front of a regular missile.
Its 50% air now. Costs the same price but half the cost u manufacture cos it half air. Good ol shrinkflation.
Depends we have multiple mathematical models for how wormholes work. Some models u cant cross through at all all. Some fuck with gravity so bad u would probably get Spaghetified. And some u wouldnt even notice except for the light looking all weird and cool af. There are multiple yt videos covering it including a really cool symulation iirc.
Starlink?
Activpub is winning. Fuck yeah lets goooooooooo