• 0 Posts
  • 508 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle









  • and she showed how it gets used against those representatives that have certain opinions, but not others.

    Thats exactly not what she showed, because it is enforced against everyone equally. The others just decided to follow the rule. I dont even believe she would have wanted to stay, she was obviously provoking it. She probably wanted to get some attention on the topic, get people to talk about it even if it meant being thrown out. It was her decision and she knew the consequences and she obviously decided it was worth it. Maybe its a good thing overall. But pretending that enforcing the rule itself was wrong is just hypocrisy.

    Look, I know its hard to accept that not everything is a conspiracy to keep the left small. Playing the victim is the far-rights tactic and we dont need to drop to their level, its pathetic.

    Everything youve been saying is completely biased and I think you know that by now but are still grasping at hypocritical straws. Enforcing rules that were set in place for keeping order in the parliament is not “anti-democratic”, how the fuck do you even come up with this bs.

    By the way, did you know Nazis drink water and breathe air? You should stop doing that, youre just repeating their behavior.



  • She knew she was going to be expelled beforehand and actively decided to wear the shirt anyway. It was her decision, not someone else making up some new arbitrary rule to expell her. You would definitely not defend a far-right politician with an “abortion is murder” shirt in the same situation. Youre simply biased. Not enforcing it after it becomes evident would be undemocratic period.

    Im really glad the rule was enforced, otherwise tomorrow the whole AfD fraction would show up with far-right rhetoric shirts and either prove that rules in the parliament dont matter or get criticized and use it to position themselves as the victims like always. Whats the use in that?

    Germany might not be Fascist yet, but by now it’s already less Democratic than most of Europe

    You have literally no idea what youre talking about. Why am I even wasting my time.








    1. Not having competitive cameras gets you off the market immediately
    2. Fairphone specifically does NOT want wireless charging because it is inefficient and terrible for the battery
    3. If its so easy for you to design a much thinner phone with completely replacable parts and a jack, you should apply for a job at Fairphone because I think they would pay you a lot for that knowledge
    4. Fairphone themselves offer sustainable bluetooth headphones
    5. Like I said, its just extra material and research cost for a feature most users dont need and those that need it can get an adapter with minimal effort and cost. I dont see a reason to include it.

    1. You do have a choice, you can get a USB-C adapter for like 1€ if you really need the jack. A phone really doesnt need more than one port imo.
    2. It costs materials, which the Fairphone is trying to save. Only a fraction of users would even use it, so why produce the waste.
    3. Theres not “plenty of space”, you still need the connection to the sound board etc. If there was plenty of space in the FPs case they would have made it thinner, the chunkiness is a major reason for people to not buy it.
    4. If they include a jack, they need to make it repairable and offer the parts, and it also costs time for designing and stuff. Id rather have them focus on the main features personally.