• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    3 months ago

    This makes me wonder how many women are quite unhappy in their marriage, and are willing to jump at the nearest opportunity.

    Kinda depressing to think about, actually.

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Work with elderly. Coworker said “how many of these women do you think have gone their entire live without an orgasm.” It connected a lot of dots. The no orgasm to elderly fox news white women is the school shooter pipeline for wasp women.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Boomer tropes exist because divorce was illegal.

      You were expected to get married and stay married. You’d have unprotected sex with your high school boyfriend, you’re goddamn right you were gonna keep the baby, and you were going to live together until one of you died. Even if it meant separate beds and not asking why he frequented that bar by the docks.

      Blame Catholicism. That’s usually a fair bet.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can freely ignore the dipshit who thinks “almost nobody was permitted to divorce” means “people went to jail for back-alley divorces.”

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      While there are quite a few people who would jump ship from their marriage, that’s not why the trope so popular. It’s just that a lot of people like different forms of “forbidden love”. Although most don’t actually dream of doing those things, it’s pure fantasy.

      • sthetic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, fictional romance is more interesting when it’s forbidden in some way. Otherwise, who wants to read a romance novel about a nice couple who meets at the library when they’re both single, and proceeds to have a wholesome relationship? Great for real life, but boring to read about or watch a movie about.

        Many of the traditional reasons for forbidding a romance are gone in the contemporary world. Different race, different social class, same gender, rival families? Not convincing.

        So you’re left with stuff that’s plausible but icky, like being in a relationship already, or being teacher/student or boss/employee. Or pornographic stuff like step-family. Those are problematic and people will criticize them.

        You could set your story in a historical setting in which the countess and the gardener are truly forbidden from passion, or a fantasy world where the ogopogos and sasquatches are sexy rivals.

        Or just have a lukewarm type of forbidden-ness, like “his family’s greeting-card store is in competition with my family’s greeting-card store” or “we’re coworkers.”

        • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          You could set your story in a historical setting in which the countess and the gardener are truly forbidden from passion, or a fantasy world where the ogopogos and sasquatches are sexy rivals.

          The amount of pirates on the covers of romance novels is the direct result of this.

          Or just have a lukewarm type of forbidden-ness, like “his family’s greeting-card store is in competition with my family’s greeting-card store” or “we’re coworkers.”

          And the hallmark channel answer. I had a coworker who would watch those every single day. I vomit at the visuals (how do they get them so consistent and apparent? You can tell just from the opening shots and title!) of a hallmark to this day.