• Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is, unlike text (like on here and Mastodon), video files can become extremely large, so you’d have to have a pretty big amount of storage to replace YouTube, federated or not.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, that’s mostly what their cost is. Servers and storage.

          I wonder how much YouTube depends on cloud storage right now.

          • TehWorld@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            100%? Do you think that there’s some box sitting under someone’s desk hosting Youtube? Hint: They’re owned by Google.

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I work in IT, I know how storage works. I just don’t know if they’re on prem hosting or primarily using a private cloud service.

              I mean they have the money, might as well offload to specialists where you can, right? I wouldn’t be building new infrastructure day and night when I could just have a B to B contract with AWS or something.