• fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      If the question OP asked was about the origin of the phrase, your reply would be a great starting point as a top level comment.

      • squid_slime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Its not a meme, its a historical quotes. Unless your saying you see it as a meme, which to me a meme is silly and easily thrown away

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah if you’re interested in origins of a phrase’s meaning, I think you’ better look into what a “meme” actually originally is before criticizing its useage here.

        • fiat_lux@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m using the original definition of the word meme: “a unit of cultural information spread by imitation”. Meme as a word doesn’t imply that it’s a comedic image macro on the internet, but I appreciate that the more modern slang usage might have made that confusing for you.

          • squid_slime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            In 50 years if “meme” evolves in the general dialect to have these connotations you pointed out I’ll feel better about it

            • livus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              evolves

              It started from what @fiat_lux defined.

              It’s ironic that you want people to recognise the roots of “eat the rich” but you’re unwilling to recognise the roots and wider meaning of “meme”.

              • squid_slime@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Its more to do with the connotation of calling something a meme.

                Maybe I am out of the loop but the description for a meme that was previously given has never occupied my mind whilst seeing a meme.

                Eat the rich with the laymen’s understanding of a meme does not fit the perceived definition.

                Where as eat the rich and its evolution still has the same connotation as it had when first spoken, most likely due to it be a quite with historical meaning.

                I am wrong with the given definition but I still see there being understandable confusion and a need for meme to evolve for it to used without confusion.

                • livus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No it’s really a very similar situation - meme was coined in 1976 (Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene) and was pretty widely known.

                  Internet memes were thus named because they are literally a subset of memes. So for people who know the wider meaning of the term it’s still got the same connotations. Calling internet memes “memes” isn’t problematic for us.

                  What’s happened to you is kind of like when people say “animal” but they’re only thinking of mammals. In most contexts the missing scope isn’t noticeable.

                  Which is understandable but going after someone for not knowing about the French revolution is a lot like going after someone for not knowing about meme theory.