It’ll be the cheapest place, by an absurd margin, to play Baldur’s Gate 3.

  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, not at all. The deck is much more convenient and no fuss. It has sleep / resume. I can be in the middle of a battle in BG3, put the thing into sleep and set it down for a week. Press resume and I’m instantly back to where I left off. No turning on the TV, booting the console, starting the game, loading your save. And the portability is convenient even for just in the house. Play on the couch, at the table with coffee and breakfast, in bed before falling asleep.

    Then when you factor in the value you get from being able to play modern games comfortably while traveling, I stand by my point that you’re a fool if you buy a series s over a deck.

    • ObiGynKenobi@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Feel free to elaborate on how the Deck is convenient to someone that isn’t interested in playing on a tiny, washed-out 800p display with sub-2 hour battery life while playing BG3, and how playing on a TV is less fuss with the Steam Deck than the Xbox. Quick resume is a completely different topic that would be irrelevant, even if the Xbox didn’t already have the exact same feature.

      Then when you factor in the value you get from being able to play modern games comfortably while traveling

      Worthless to someone that only wants to play at home on their TV, or isn’t tethered to an outlet. It seems you’re wholly incapable of comprehending that there are people with different use-cases and priorities than your own, and for those people the Steam Deck is a vastly inferior and costlier option. Buying the device that best meets their needs doesn’t make them a fool. It’s astounding that you don’t get this.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is wild.

      I do almost all my gaming on the deck. It’s great because of what it is as a handheld. If you don’t intend to use those features, the lack of power makes a serious dent in the value it provides. And “no fuss” is correct compared to other PC handhelds, but crazy compared to an Xbox.

      • ObiGynKenobi@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, this person is so deluded in their steam deck zealotry that they’ve lost touch with reality. In one comment they argue the steam deck’s value is in its Linux OS and ability to emulate Switch games, then in the next they argue that the thing is “much more convenient and no fuss”. The only convenience is in the portability. If you aren’t interested in sacrificing power for portability, that offers zero value. As for emulation, arguing that is no fuss would be laughable. Even native steam games can be iffy, requiring troubleshooting like swapping proton versions and entering launch commands. There’s a reason ProtonDB exists, and the Xbox doesn’t need something comparable.

        The Steam Deck is great for what it is, but the only console it compares (and is vastly superior) to is the Switch.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s basically all I use, and most of the headaches are more about publisher hostility than any actual issues with Linux (no, you not being able to install your fucking rootkit is not a failing). I basically don’t even look at any of those statuses because I don’t feel like I need to. Almost everything actually does just work.

          But we’re comparing it to a console lol. That, to the point of baked in performance settings tuned to the exact hardware, are their whole purpose.

          • ObiGynKenobi@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Agreed. It’s a lack of publisher support that has created the issues with Linux gaming. To some extent I understand, given the minute market share Linux has historically possessed, but ultimately it’s just corporate greed. Valve is serving as a force for change, though; not altruistically, but a force nonetheless. Once Linux has a large enough install base, publishers will go where there’s money to be made, whatever anti-cheat concessions they have to make.

          • ObiGynKenobi@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lmao. Mate, I was an early adopter of the steam deck. I appreciate it for what it is, and I acknowledge its limitations. Meanwhile, you live in a fantasy where those limitations don’t exist and you’re unable to even acknowledge basic, objective facts. It’s fine that you love your steam deck but Jesus Christ, go touch some grass. Get outside your bubble for a second.