For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don’t want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That’s ludicrous!

That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use “less” when they should use “fewer”

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Petty hill

    If you keep correcting very minor grammatical mistakes when I am speaking, such as “you mean fewer, not less”, I will just stop talking to you entirely

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Turns out language is pretty damn flexible. Even if I made an obvious mistake, you meant what I knew.

    • rainynight65@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      It’s simple though. If you can count it, it’s fewer. If not, it’s less.

      Fewer people. Less noise.

      • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        That isn’t a grammatic rule. Some guy in the recent past was like “I think it sounds better that way.” It was his personal preference.

        That’s all.

        They’ve always been used interchangeably, for as long as English has been a written language.

        People who love to “correct” this are just showing ass to anyone who knows any better haha.

        • rainynight65@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          26 days ago

          This is a way in which you can discredit any attempt at proposing correct or logical language use. Yes, language changes. Your assertions are still debatable. English is ambiguous enough as is. It’s not ‘showing ads’ to propose some form of consistent or logical usage of words. I’m happy to count that as a petty hill I’m willing to die on.

          And since we’re being petty, it’s either ‘grammatical rule’, or ‘Grammar rule’.

          • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            This is a way in which you can discredit any attempt at proposing correct or logical language use

            It absolutely is not. You’re just talking out of your ass.

            The same one that you are, in fact, showing when you demand that the personal preference of some random stranger is the way that everyone has to talk from now on. Ludicrous.

            • rainynight65@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              You need some salsa for that chip on your shoulder, or is there another reason why you’re getting so personal?

              Don’t answer. I don’t actually care.