• Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Turn them all off except the ones explicitly tied to Ukraine military and government.

    • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Across the whole wide world? So only Ukraine’s military and gov’t can use them? (And maybe a few related exceptions, e.g. for US gov’t and military.)

      That would do the trick, I think (except for the rare case of the Russians capturing a terminal from a Ukraine unit and then using it before Ukraine can notify Starlink to deactivate it).

      Probably a major money losing proposition for Starlink, but on the other hand, does Musk really need any more money?

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        In the conflict area you could ban all terminals that are not tied to Ukraine. Not worldwide. As satellites enter conflict area they will receive traffic from new terminals, check are these terminals registered to the good guys and turn off all others.

    • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’re forging the GPS to look like it’s in the EU. Do we turn off all the EU terminals too?

      I’m a little surprised they can’t identify spoofing by comparing the incoming signal to the proposed location. They already have antennas that can be steered using the phased array.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You answered your owm question right there.

        No we dont shut off the eu, we shut off any terminals picked up by sattelites over ukraine and Russia. They have multiple satellites and could discern position from which satellites see them when.