Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

  • Nalivai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Plants don’t have an agent that feels negative or positive feelings. Its stimulus-response system starts and stops at that. Animals on the other hand can experience suffering and pleasure, and and it’s morally wrong to inflict the first and deny the second

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      suffering and pleasure, and and it’s morally wrong to inflict the first and deny the second

      this is only true under a limited set of moral beliefs. most people aren’t utilitarians though

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Plants don’t have an agent that feels negative or positive feelings.

      you can’t prove that

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        you can’t prove that

        I also can’t prove that you have one. It’s not a standard we operate under.

        • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I also can’t prove that you have one

          so it’s probably not a good basis for making moral decisions

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            It is. You’re already doing it, otherwise you will be having zero problems with killing and eating random humans. You just put your line at believing that humans have agency, even though you just as much can’t prove that.
            We have pretty good understanding of how biological organisms operate at this point. We don’t need to spend generations on disproving solipsism anymore.

            • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              You just put your line at believing that humans have agency, even though you just as much can’t prove that.

              you’re projecting.

            • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              You’re already doing it, otherwise you will be having zero problems with killing and eating random humans.

              no, that’s not the basis of my moral decisions