Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

  • desinetizen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    You commented without any methodology at all, how do you expect to be taken seriously? It’s not just “this” study either, every credible study on the matter shows quite clearly how disastrous animal agriculture is on the environment. Are you going to claim they all suffer from the same flawed methodology? Do you also believe that climate change is a hoax?

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Are you going to claim they all suffer from the same flawed methodology? Do you also believe that climate change is a hoax?

      Bring your counterpoints, not personal accusations.

      • desinetizen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        You contradicted without any evidence or reasoning. I reminded you that it’s a pretty well-known fact, not something one study unexpectedly revealed, and asked how you would go about discrediting all the science. No personal accusation.

        • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I showed my reasoning, and the evidence is in the citations of the study we are discussing, and their citations

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      i’m certainly willing to read any study you can present. this study relies almost entirely on poore-nemecek 2018, which combined LCA data gathered with disparate methodologies, and did so against the guidance of the LCA studies themselves. it’s garbage. it’s not science. writing a study that relies so heavily on that study is also garbage.