• bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    America absolutely wrecked the situation in Korea and for little other reason than rabid anticommunist sentiment.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      While the US has done shitty stuff and did even in Korea.

      I would bet almost all of South Korea prefers their current situation over having the entire peninsula look like N.K. and living like that.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps the DPRK wouldn’t be as poor and reclusive if they hadn’t had almost all the cities in the north bombed until there was nothing left by Americans. And South Korea’s situation was really not that great either for a long time. It was led by brutal US installed leaders like Singman Rhee. The north was much better off by most metrics until later on.

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          So it’s better despite having an equally brutal regime? With a leader worship akin to Ancient Rome? It feels like you’re splitting hairs tbh.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s undeniable that the embargo is responsible for quite a lot of economic suffering in North Korea while only strengthening the Kim monarchy’s grip.

          It’s also undeniable that the South Korean government eventually reformed their way out of fascism. Was that narrow, twisty, and decades long path worth the war that was fought, given it is also simply impossible to say what would have happened if the Allies had let the fascists in South Korea be conquered?

          Would that have strengthened the Kims, or would they be more like the modern Vietnamese government? Or would they just have been annexed by the PRC?

        • crackajack@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          North Korea had higher standards of living than South Korea until the 1980s. Bombing hasn’t really got anything to with how bad North Korean system is.

          • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            ? They’re just using the real name.

            Do you get mad when people call “America” USA?

            • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a thing normal people call the US, I’ve never heard someone call it the DPRK who wasn’t a weird tankie that circlejerks about how cool north Korea is and how Putin is getting the gang back together and shit

              • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are a number of states that involve split countries, contested land, or military occupation, where it is useful to be specific. Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland both exist in the country of Ireland. DPRK and ROK both exist in the country of Korea. Israel and occupied Palestine both exist in the country of Palestine. Republic of Somalia and Republic of Somaliland both exist in the country of Somalia. The PRC and ROC both exist within the country of China. Before reunification, there were the DDR/GDR and BRD/FRG in the country of Germany