• QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it just me getting unreasonably irritated when the artist captions the things they’re depicting, as if we’re either too dumb to understand or they suck at making subtle references?

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a political comics thing that has its roots in England around 250 300 years ago. The comic is meant simultaneously to be funny (and therefore disarming) and legitimate political propaganda. To ensure that the political propaganda message is not lost on the masses they label everything to make sure their message most clearly gets across.

      For example, see this political cartoon from 1903. Panama_canal_cartoon_1903.jpg

      • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s actually cool to know, though I dislike the practice, they kinda look like previous century memes lol

        For example, see this political cartoon from 1903.

        That was lost on me either way, but I guess it’s just my lack of knowledge on US’s history 👀

        • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          The cartoon shows the US aligning with Panama separatist factions to break from Colombia so that they can permit the construction of the channel.

          Panama was a separate colony from Colombia, but they joined when becoming independent.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I find it utterly hilarious that the cited purpose is clarity, but the referenced comic required explanation. Bravo.

            Also thanks for the explanation because I wasn’t getting it, either. Makes sense, though. Give it a few hundred years and English might be so different the labels wouldn’t have mattered at all, let alone missing context.

            • thatgirlwasfire@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m guessing you just don’t know History very well, i didn’t need any sort of explanation to understand the comic.

              • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Good for you! Totally and completely irrelevant to my point.

                The comic already required explanation … while it had text on it. Nothing you say, do, or believe will EVER change the fact that the comic required explanation about as soon as it was posted.

                Grow up and realize you are not the main character. Your beliefs or knowledge do not change reality.

          • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t necessary know about the intelligence part, I’ve seen plenty of braindead political cartoons

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not seeing too many labels. You get an F for this political meme, good sir!

              … I know it’s not political, but how am I to know without labels??

    • DharkStare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      These sorts of comics have been captioned like this for decades. I’m not sure if they were ever not captioned.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If anything I think they were even more obvious back then… The Troll would have had “Troll” written on their laptop and so on…

          • bug@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Definitely just a cute little goblin hanging out in the toilet, annoyed that all these chumps have rocked up and interrupted his computer time

      • GreenMario@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen some done in the 1800s. Captioned.

        At this point it’s a staple of the genre.

    • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s just the way political comics goes. It’s expected and common. It’s not a web comic, bruh; there’s a tradition to maintain.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not all political comics are like that though, the best ones don’t need the labelling.

        • FormerlyChucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least when Garrison does it it’s so over the top it’s farcical and ridiculous which makes it funny unlike this comic

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, his audience seems to pretty obviously need things spelled out for them. In very, very short words.