• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because we don’t vote based on agreement but on “people should or shouldn’t see this.”

        • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          It also has downvotes. And as @avidamoeba@lemmy.ca says, this isn’t Reddit. Up- and down-votes are not a popularity contest.

          • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Now it does. When I came, it stood at 8 upvotes.

            And while I expressed myself badly, the reason I downvoted is: I think it’s largely a bad take and I suspect there must be a more reasonable take on the finance union available somewhere.

            • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t entirely disagree, and you may be right about the financial union. I’ve also downvoted this post because I think it’s a waste of space that no one should waste time on – unless they need even more convincing that Axel Springer is garbage. I was originally surprised at such a biased piece from Politico, largely because I forgot that they were sold out to Axel Springer.