hypertown@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoWEB 4.69lemmy.worldimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down12
arrow-up1122arrow-down1imageWEB 4.69lemmy.worldhypertown@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squarehypertown@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 year agoWell discord could offer P2P option with no limit…
minus-squareclb92@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoBut then they can’t force you to get Discord Nitro.
minus-squarehypertown@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoThis could be a nitro feature though
minus-squareratamacue@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoBut discord supports sending messages to people who are offline. It kind of breaks the paradigm if certain features require full synchronous communication. Maybe supporting p2p transfers during a video / voice chat would work though.
minus-squareDreamlandLividity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoYou say it as if not allowing people to send large files at all is somehow better than only allowing it sometimes.
minus-squareHelluin@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year ago It kind of breaks the paradigm if certain features require full synchronous communication. you mean like voice/video chat?
Well discord could offer P2P option with no limit…
But then they can’t force you to get Discord Nitro.
This could be a nitro feature though
But discord supports sending messages to people who are offline. It kind of breaks the paradigm if certain features require full synchronous communication. Maybe supporting p2p transfers during a video / voice chat would work though.
You say it as if not allowing people to send large files at all is somehow better than only allowing it sometimes.
you mean like voice/video chat?