The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 kuukautta sittenBad newslemmy.worldimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1384arrow-down130
arrow-up1354arrow-down1imageBad newslemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 kuukautta sittenmessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareAgentGrimstone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·5 kuukautta sittenLet’s double check 225 x 2 Solve for x
minus-squareAnnoyed_🦀 @monyet.cclinkfedilinkarrow-up58·5 kuukautta sittenAnswer: X = Formerly Twitter
minus-squareTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·4 kuukautta sittenSo it’s value is essentially zero?
minus-squareElvith Ma'for@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 kuukautta sittenSo… 22502 is the solution!
minus-squareLouNeko@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·5 kuukautta sittenLet’s put 2 on the other side. 225 x 2 Now 2 wears 225 as a hat. Which means x is kinda funny.
minus-squarefl42v@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-25 kuukautta sittenLefthand side is empty, “empty” is not a number, hence x is NaN as well.
minus-squarelugal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 kuukautta sittenWhen people don’t learn roman numerals at school anymore… It’s 10, plain and simple
Let’s double check
225 x 2
Solve for x
Answer: X = Formerly Twitter
So it’s value is essentially zero?
So… 22502 is the solution!
Let’s put 2 on the other side.
225 x 2
Now 2 wears 225 as a hat. Which means x is kinda funny.
Lefthand side is empty, “empty” is not a number, hence x is NaN as well.
No
When people don’t learn roman numerals at school anymore…
It’s 10, plain and simple